首页> 外文期刊>Physical Review, A. Atomic, molecular, and optical physics >Comparative study of BCS-BEC crossover theories above T-c: The nature of the pseudogap in ultracold atomic Fermi gases
【24h】

Comparative study of BCS-BEC crossover theories above T-c: The nature of the pseudogap in ultracold atomic Fermi gases

机译:T-c之上的BCS-BEC交叉理论的比较研究:超冷原子费米气体中假间隙的性质

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents a comparison of two finite-temperature BCS-Bose-Einstein condensation (BEC) crossover theories above the transition temperature: Nozieres-Schmitt-Rink (NSR) theory and finite-T extended BCS-Leggett theory. The comparison is cast in the form of numerical studies of the behavior of the fermionic spectral function both theoretically and as constrained by (primarily) radio frequency (rf) experiments. Both theories include pair fluctuations and exhibit pseudogap effects, although the nature of this pseudogap is very different. The pseudogap in finite-T extended BCS-Leggett theory is found to follow a BCS-like dispersion which, in turn, is associated with a broadened BCS-like self-energy, rather more similar to what is observed in high-temperature superconductors (albeit, for a d-wave case). The fermionic quasiparticle dispersion is different in NSR theory and the damping is considerably larger. We argue that the two theories are appropriate in different temperature regimes with the BCS-Leggett approach being more suitable nearer to condensation. There should, in effect, be little difference at higher T as the pseudogap becomes weaker and where the simplifying approximations used in the BCS-Leggett approach break down. On the basis of momentum-integrated rf studies of unpolarized gases, it would be difficult to distinguish which theory is the better one. A full comparison for polarized gases is not possible since it is claimed that there are inconsistencies in the NSR approach (not found in the BCS-Leggett scheme). Future experiments along the lines of momentum-resolved experiments look to be very promising in distinguishing the two theories.
机译:本文介绍了两种高于转变温度的有限温度BCS-玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚(BEC)交叉理论:Nozieres-Schmitt-Rink(NSR)理论和有限T扩展BCS-Leggett理论。该比较以理论上和受(主要)射频(rf)实验约束的费米离子光谱函数行为的数值研究形式进行。两种理论都包括成对波动并表现出伪间隙效应,尽管这种伪间隙的性质非常不同。发现有限T扩展BCS-Leggett理论中的伪间隙遵循类似BCS的色散,这又与类似BCS的自增能有关,这与在高温超导体中观察到的类似( (对于d波情况)。在NSR理论中,铁离子准粒子的分散性不同,并且阻尼较大。我们认为这两种理论适用于不同的温度范围,而BCS-Leggett方法更适合于冷凝。实际上,随着伪间隙变弱并且在BCS-Leggett方法中使用的简化近似值会失效,在较高的T处应该几乎没有差异。在对非极化气体进行动量积分射频研究的基础上,很难区分哪种理论更好。由于据称NSR方法存在不一致之处(在BCS-Leggett方案中未发现),因此无法对极化气体进行全面比较。在区分这两种理论方面,未来的动量解析实验似乎很有希望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号