...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical reviews in oncology/hematology >Lessons from the comparison of two randomized clinical trials using gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.
【24h】

Lessons from the comparison of two randomized clinical trials using gemcitabine and cisplatin for advanced biliary tract cancer.

机译:比较吉西他滨和顺铂治疗晚期胆道癌的两项随机临床试验的经验教训。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There had been no standard chemotherapy established for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) until 2009, when the combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine (GC) was adopted as a first line standard chemotherapy option based on the results from two randomized studies: ABC-02, a UK investigator-initiated trial and the largest randomized phase III study in this tumor type with 410 patients; and BT22, a Japanese, industry-sponsored, randomized phase II study with 83 patients. In this review, investigators from both studies collaborated to compare protocols, patient characteristics, and outcomes of both studies including sub-analyses of study results. Although both studies showed GC combination therapy to be more effective than monotherapy, a detailed comparison revealed disparities between efficacy and safety end-points between the studies, which did not necessarily arise from different populations but from differences in protocol design. This review provides clinicians with insights for advanced BTC clinical study design and interpretation of historical studies.
机译:直到2009年为止,尚未建立针对晚期胆道癌(BTC)的标准化学疗法,当时基于两项随机研究的结果,顺铂和吉西他滨(GC)的组合被用作一线标准化学疗法选项:ABC-02,一项由英国研究人员发起的试验,也是该肿瘤类型中最大的III期随机研究,涉及410名患者; BT22是一项由日本资助的由行业赞助的随机II期研究,涉及83位患者。在这篇综述中,来自两项研究的研究者进行了合作,以比较两项研究的方案,患者特征和结果,包括研究结果的子分析。尽管两项研究均显示GC联合疗法比单一疗法更有效,但详细的比较显示研究之间功效和安全性终点之间存在差异,这不一定来自不同的人群,而是源自方案设计的差异。该评价为临床医生提供了有关高级BTC临床研究设计和历史研究解释的见识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号