首页> 外文期刊>Creativity Research Journal >Creativity and ego defense mechanisms: some exploratory empirical evidence
【24h】

Creativity and ego defense mechanisms: some exploratory empirical evidence

机译:创造力和自我防御机制:一些探索性的经验证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Two samples of college students (n = 40 each) drawn from a larger sample (N = 188) were identified as high creative or low creative based on their performance on 5 measures of creativity that included both tests of creativity and actual creative production such as haiku poetry. The students were then interviewed with a semi-structured procedure, and the video recordings of the interviews assessed as to the utilization of each of 15 ego defense styles. Thirteen of the 15 ego defense styles showed statistically significant mean differences, with high creatives scoring higher on schizoid fantasy, acting out, dissociation, displacement, reaction formation, intellectualization, humor, suppression, and sublimation; they scored lower on projection, passive aggressiveness, repression, and altruism.
机译:根据大样本(N = 188)中的两个大学生样本(每人40个),根据他们在5个创造力指标(包括创造力测试和实际创造力测试)上的表现,将其确定为高创造力或低创造力ku句诗。然后用半结构化的程序对学生进行访谈,并对访谈的录像进行评估,以评估15种自我防御方式的使用情况。在15种自我防御方式中,有13种在统计学上具有显着的均值差异,高级创意者在类精神幻想,行动,解离,置换,反应形成,知识化,幽默,抑制和升华方面得分更高;他们在投射,被动进取,压制和利他主义方面得分较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号