...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Institutional variations in frequency of discharge of elderly intensive care survivors to postacute care facilities.
【24h】

Institutional variations in frequency of discharge of elderly intensive care survivors to postacute care facilities.

机译:老年重症监护幸存者出院后到急救设施出院频率的制度差异。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To examine variations in the frequency of discharge of elderly patients to postacute care facilities across multiple intensive care units and identify the influence of institutional and patient factors on the frequency of postacute care discharge. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: Consecutive admissions from 65 intensive and coronary care units in 24 US hospitals during 2002-2008. Each hospital had a clinical information system in place. PATIENTS: A total of 13,370 admissions in patients aged>/=65 yrs who were alive at hospital discharge and met inclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, and physiological variables were obtained on all patients. In addition, information for each hospital and intensive care unit was recorded. Among hospital survivors, 46.2% were discharged to postacute care facilities with a range of 8.8-77.8%. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed that predicted discharge to a postacute care facility. The major variables affecting postacute care discharge were diagnosis, day 5 physiology, and day 5 therapy; these variables accounted for 61% of the model's explanatory power. Patient age, hospital bed size, teaching status, and intensive care unit type also affected postacute care discharge. Physiology and therapy on day 1 had little impact on postacute care discharge. The model accounted for only 31% of the variation in rates across intensive care units, indicating that unmeasured factors play a part in dictating discharge location. CONCLUSION: Discharge of elderly intensive care unit patients to postacute care facilities varies widely by institution. These variations are only partially explained by differences in patient and institutional characteristics and are affected more by diagnosis and physiology on day 5, respectively. Unmeasured factors such as admission from a postacute care facility, postacute care availability, patient preferences, and socioeconomic factors may account for unexplained variations in postacute care discharge.
机译:目的:研究跨多个重症监护病房的老年患者出院后护理设施出院频率的变化,并确定机构和患者因素对出院后护理出院频率的影响。设计:观察性队列研究。地点:2002-2008年间,来自美国24家医院的65个重症监护和冠心病监护病房连续入院。每个医院都有一个临床信息系统。患者:出院时存活且符合纳入标准的年龄≥65岁的患者共收治13370例。干预措施:无。测量和主要结果:获得了所有患者的人口统计学,临床,诊断和生理变量。此外,还记录了每个医院和重症监护室的信息。在医院幸存者中,有46.2%出院到急救后护理设施中,占8.8-77.8%。建立了多变量logistic回归模型,该模型可预测急性后护理设施的出院情况。影响急性护理后出院的主要变量是诊断,第5天生理和第5天治疗。这些变量占模型解释力的61%。患者年龄,病床大小,教学状况和重症监护病房类型也影响急性护理后出院。第1天的生理和治疗对急性护理后出院的影响很小。该模型仅占重症监护病房费率变化的31%,表明未测因素在决定出院位置中起作用。结论:各机构对老年重症监护病房患者出院后急救设施的出院情况差异很大。这些差异仅部分由患者和机构特征的差异来解释,并且分别在第5天受到诊断和生理的影响更大。不可估量的因素,例如从急性后护理设施的入院,急性后护理的可获得性,患者的喜好以及社会经济因素,可能解释了急性后护理出院的无法解释的变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号