...
【24h】

Test-item sequence affects false memory formation: An event-related potential study.

机译:测试项目序列会影响错误记忆的形成:一项与事件相关的潜在研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

False memories arise when people 'remember' experiences that have never occurred. Using the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm, researchers have demonstrated that participants tend to falsely recognize non-studied words (lures) that are associated to previously studied words. Several questions, however, remain regarding the neurocognitive basis of false memory formation. Various encoding manipulations have been shown to affect the behavioral and electrophysiological correlates of false memories, but little is known about whether false memory formation and its neurophysiological correlates are influenced by different test contexts. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) during the DRM paradigm, wherein the test included lures that were either preceded by semantically related words or not. Results indicated more false recognitions for lures preceded by related words than for lures that were not preceded by related words at test. Furthermore, the former elicited more positive parietal potentialsat 300-600ms relative to the latter. These findings suggest that test context critically affects behavioral and neurophysiological responses for false memory, providing further insight into the neurocognitive basis of human memory.
机译:当人们“记住”从未发生过的经历时,就会产生错误的记忆。研究人员使用Deese-Roediger-McDermott(DRM)范例证明,参与者倾向于错误地识别与先前研究的单词相关的未研究单词(单词)。但是,关于错误记忆形成的神经认知基础仍然存在一些问题。各种编码操作已显示出会影响错误记忆的行为和电生理相关性,但对于错误记忆的形成及其神经生理相关性是否受不同测试环境的影响知之甚少。我们在DRM范例期间记录了与事件相关的电位(ERP),其中的测试包括诱饵,这些诱饵要么之前带有语义相关的单词,要么不包含语义相关的单词。结果表明,与在测试中没有相关单词的引诱相比,对相关单词前面的引诱的错误识别更多。此外,相对于后者,前者在300-600ms处产生更多的正壁电位。这些发现表明,测试环境严重影响了错误记忆的行为和神经生理反应,从而进一步洞察了人类记忆的神经认知基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号