...
首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage >Trails of meaning construction: Symbolic artifacts engage the social brain
【24h】

Trails of meaning construction: Symbolic artifacts engage the social brain

机译:意义建构的痕迹:象征性文物吸引着社会的大脑

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Symbolic artifacts present a challenge to theories of neurocognitive processing due to their hybrid nature: they are at the same time physical objects and vehicles of intangible social meanings. While their physical properties can be read of their perceptual appearance, the meaning of symbolic artifacts depends on the perceiver's interpretative attitude and embeddedness in cultural practices. In this study, participants built models of LEGO bricks to illustrate their understanding of abstract concepts. They were then scanned with fMRI while presented to photographs of their own and others' models. When participants attended to the meaning of the models in contrast to their bare physical properties, we observed activations in mPFC and TPJ, areas often associated with social cognition, and IFG, possibly related to semantics. When contrasting own and others' models, we also found activations in precuneus, an area associated with autobiographical memory and agency, while looking at one's own collective models yielded interaction effects in rostral ACC, right IFG and left Insula. Interestingly, variability in the insula was predicted by individual differences in participants' feeling of relatedness to their fellow group members during LEGO construction activity. Our findings support a view of symbolic artifacts as neurocognitive trails of human social interactions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:象征性人工制品由于其混合性而对神经认知加工理论提出了挑战:它们同时是具有非物质社会意义的物理对象和媒介。虽然可以从感知外观上了解其物理特性,但象征性人工制品的含义取决于感知者的解释态度和文化实践中的嵌入性。在这项研究中,参与者建立了乐高积木模型来说明他们对抽象概念的理解。然后使用fMRI对其进行扫描,同时呈现给自己和他人模型的照片。当参与者关注模型的意义(与其裸露的物理特性相比)时,我们观察到了mPFC和TPJ(通常与社会认知和IFG相关的领域,可能与语义相关)的激活。在比较自己和他人的模型时,我们还发现了前胎激活,这是与自传记忆和代理相关的区域,同时观察自己的集体模型在延髓ACC,右IFG和左Insula中产生了交互作用。有趣的是,通过在乐高积木活动期间参与者与小组成员之间的亲密感的个体差异来预测绝缘的变化。我们的发现支持将象征性人工制品视为人类社会互动的神经认知线索的观点。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号