...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Randomized ICU trials do not demonstrate an association between interventions that reduce delirium duration and short-term mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【24h】

Randomized ICU trials do not demonstrate an association between interventions that reduce delirium duration and short-term mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:ICU随机试验未显示减少do妄持续时间的干预措施与短期死亡率之间的关联:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVES: We reviewed randomized trials of adult ICU patients of interventions hypothesized to reduce delirium burden to determine whether interventions that are more effective at reducing delirium duration are associated with a reduction in short-term mortality. DATA SOURCES: We searched CINHAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane databases from 2001 to 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Citations were screened for randomized trials that enrolled critically ill adults, evaluated delirium at least daily, compared a drug or nondrug intervention hypothesized to reduce delirium burden with standard care (or control), and reported delirium duration and/or short-term mortality (≤ 45 d). DATA EXTRACTION: In duplicate, we abstracted trial characteristics and results and evaluated quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We performed random effects model meta-analyses and meta-regressions. DATA SYNTHESIS: We included 17 trials enrolling 2,849 patients which evaluated a pharmacologic intervention (n = 13) (dexmedetomidine [n = 6], an antipsychotic [n = 4], rivastigmine [n = 2], and clonidine [n = 1]), a multimodal intervention (n = 2) (spontaneous awakening [n = 2]), or a nonpharmacologic intervention (n = 2) (early mobilization [n = 1] and increased perfusion [n = 1]). Overall, average delirium duration was lower in the intervention groups (difference = -0.64 d; 95% CI, -1.15 to -0.13; p = 0.01) being reduced by more than or equal to 3 days in three studies, 0.1 to less than 3 days in six studies, 0 day in seven studies, and less than 0 day in one study. Across interventions, for 13 studies where short-term mortality was reported, short-term mortality was not reduced (risk ratio = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.76-1.06; p = 0.19). Across 13 studies that reported mortality, meta-regression revealed that delirium duration was not associated with reduced short-term mortality (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: A review of current evidence fails to support that ICU interventions that reduce delirium duration reduce short-term mortality. Larger controlled studies are needed to establish this relationship.
机译:目的:我们回顾了对成人ICU患者进行的减少trials妄负担的干预措施的随机试验,以确定在减少del妄持续时间方面更有效的干预措施是否与短期死亡率降低相关。数据来源:我们搜索了2001年至2012年之间的CINHAHL,EMBASE,MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库。研究选择:筛选了包括重症成年人,至少每天进行del妄评估,比较被认为可减少药物或非药物干预的随机试验的引文。标准护理(或对照)的妄负担,以及报告的ir妄持续时间和/或短期死亡率(≤45 d)。数据提取:一式两份,我们提取了临床特征和结果,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估了质量。我们进行了随机效应模型的荟萃分析和荟萃回归。数据综合:我们纳入了17项试验,招募了2849名患者,评估了药物干预(n = 13)(右美托咪定[n = 6],抗精神病药[n = 4],卡巴拉汀[n = 2]和可乐定[n = 1] ),多模式干预(n = 2)(自发性唤醒[n = 2])或非药物干预(n = 2)(早期动员[n = 1]和增加的灌注[n = 1])。总体而言,在三项研究中,干预组的平均del妄持续时间较短(差异= -0.64 d; 95%CI,-1.15至-0.13; p = 0.01),减少或超过3天,减少0.1至少于六项研究中的3天,七项研究中的0天,而一项研究中少于0天。在所有干预措施中,对于13项报告了短期死亡率的研究,短期死亡率并未降低(风险比= 0.90; 95%CI为0.76-1.06; p = 0.19)。在报告死亡率的13项研究中,荟萃回归显示del妄持续时间与短期死亡率降低无关(p = 0.11)。结论:对当前证据的回顾未能支持减少CU妄持续时间的ICU干预措施可降低短期死亡率。需要建立更大的对照研究来建立这种关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号