首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Anti-infective external coating of central venous catheters: a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing 5-fluorouracil with chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine in preventing catheter colonization.
【24h】

Anti-infective external coating of central venous catheters: a randomized, noninferiority trial comparing 5-fluorouracil with chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine in preventing catheter colonization.

机译:中央静脉导管的抗感染外涂层:一项比较5-氟尿嘧啶与氯己定/磺胺嘧啶在预防导管定植中的随机,非劣效性试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: The antimetabolite drug, 5-fluorouracil, inhibits microbial growth. Coating of central venous catheters with 5-fluorouracil may reduce the risk of catheter infection. Our objective was to compare the safety and efficacy of central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil with those coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine. DESIGN: Prospective, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled, multicentered, noninferiority trial. SETTING: Twenty-five US medical center intensive care units. PATIENTS: A total of 960 adult patients requiring central venous catheterization for up to 28 days. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive a central venous catheter externally coated with either 5-fluorouracil (n = 480) or chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine (n = 480). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary antimicrobial outcome was a dichotomous measure (<15 colony-forming units or >/= 15 colony-forming units) for catheter colonization determined by the roll plate method. Secondary antimicrobial outcomes included local site infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Central venous catheters coated with 5-fluorouracil were noninferior to chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine coated central venous catheters with respect to the incidence of catheter colonization (2.9% vs. 5.3%, respectively). Local site infection occurred in 1.4% of the 5-fluorouracil group and 0.9% of the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. No episode of catheter-related bloodstream infection occurred in the 5-fluorouracil group, whereas two episodes were noted in the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine group. Only Gram-positive organisms were cultured from 5-fluorouracil catheters, whereas Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, and Candida were cultured from the chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine central venous catheters. Adverse events were comparable between the two central venous catheter coatings. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that central venous catheters externally coated with 5-fluorouracil are a safe and effective alternative to catheters externally coated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine when used in critically ill patients.
机译:目的:抗代谢药物5-氟尿嘧啶抑制微生物生长。在中心静脉导管上涂5-氟尿嘧啶可降低导管感染的风险。我们的目的是比较外部涂有5-氟尿嘧啶的中央静脉导管与涂有洗必太和磺胺嘧啶银的中央静脉导管的安全性和有效性。设计:前瞻性,单盲,随机,主动控制,多中心,非劣效性试验。地点:美国的25个医疗中心重症监护室。患者:总共960名需要中心静脉导管治疗的成年患者长达28天。干预措施:患者被随机分配接受中心静脉导管,外部涂有5-氟尿嘧啶(n = 480)或洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银(n = 480)。测量和主要结果:主要的抗菌结果是通过滚板法确定的导管定居的二分法(<15个菌落形成单位或> / = 15个菌落形成单位)。次要的抗菌治疗结果包括局部感染和导管相关的血流感染。就导管定植的发生率而言,涂有5-氟尿嘧啶的中央静脉导管不比洗必太和磺胺嘧啶银涂布的中央静脉导管差(分别为2.9%和5.3%)。 5-氟尿嘧啶组占1.4%,洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银组占0.9%。 5-氟尿嘧啶组未发生导管相关的血流感染发作,而洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银组则发生了两次发作。从5-氟尿嘧啶导管中仅培养出革兰氏阳性菌,而从洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银中央静脉导管中培养出革兰氏阳性菌,革兰氏阴性菌和念珠菌。在两个中央静脉导管涂层之间的不良事件相当。结论:我们的结果表明,当用于重症患者时,外部涂有5-氟尿嘧啶的中央静脉导管是安全地替代外部涂有洗必泰和磺胺嘧啶银的导管。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号