首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Adverse outcomes associated with the use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis and baseline bleeding precautions.
【24h】

Adverse outcomes associated with the use of drotrecogin alfa (activated) in patients with severe sepsis and baseline bleeding precautions.

机译:患有严重脓毒症和基线出血预防措施的患者使用德罗曲金α(激活)会产生不良后果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Key clinical trials involving drotrecogin alfa (activated) (or recombinant human activated protein C) excluded patients with specific baseline bleeding precautions. However, not all such precautions are considered contraindications to treatment with recombinant human activated protein C in current product labeling. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients receiving recombinant human activated protein C with or without baseline bleeding precautions as defined by the Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) trial. DESIGN: Retrospective medical record review. SETTING: Two tertiary care institutions: An academic medical center and an affiliated Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: All patients receiving recombinant human activated protein C for treatment of sepsis. INTERVENTIONS: Demographic information, characteristics associated with inclusion and exclusion criteria of the PROWESS trial, and 30-day postdischarge outcomes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-three patients received recombinant human activated protein C. Serious bleeding events occurred in 7 of 20 patients (35%) with any baseline bleeding precaution vs. only 2 of 53 patients (3.8%) without any bleeding precautions (p < 0.0001). More patients with a baseline bleeding precaution died compared with patients without any bleeding precautions (65% vs. 24.5%, p = 0.0015). Patients with a baseline bleeding precaution had a higher mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (27.5 vs. 22.7, p = 0.015). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the presence of a baseline bleeding precaution was the only independent variable associated with occurrence of serious bleeding events. The presence of a baseline bleeding precaution, increased Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, and the presence of bloodstream infection were independent variables associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe sepsis who received recombinant human activated protein C with baseline bleeding precautions as defined by product labeling had significantly higher rates of both serious bleeding events and deaths compared with those without bleeding precautions. These data suggest that strict adherence to PROWESS trial exclusion criteria would further limit serious bleeding events associated with the use of recombinant human activated protein C.
机译:背景:涉及drotrecogin alfa(活化)(或重组人活化蛋白C)的关键临床试验排除了具有特定基线出血预防措施的患者。但是,在当前产品标签中,并非所有此类预防措施都被视为禁忌使用重组人活化蛋白C进行治疗。目的:比较接受重组人活化蛋白C(严重性脓毒症)全球评估的定义中是否接受基线止血措施的重组人活化蛋白C的患者的预后。设计:回顾性病历审查。地点:两个三级护理机构:一个学术医疗中心和一个附属的退伍军人事务医疗中心。患者:所有接受重组人活化蛋白C治疗败血症的患者。干预措施:人口统计学信息,与PROWESS试验的纳入和排除标准相关的特征以及出院后30天的结果。测量和主要结果:73例患者接受了重组人激活蛋白C的治疗。20例患者中有7例发生严重出血事件(35%),有基线预防措施,而53例患者中只有2例(3.8%)没有采取任何出血预防措施( p <0.0001)。与没有任何出血预防措施的患者相比,更多有基线出血预防措施的患者死亡(65%vs. 24.5%,p = 0.0015)。采取基本出血预防措施的患者的平均急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分更高(27.5 vs. 22.7,p = 0.015)。多变量分析表明,基线出血预防措施的存在是与严重出血事件发生相关的唯一独立变量。基线出血预防措施的存在,急性生理学和慢性健康评估II评分的增加以及血流感染的存在是与死亡率相关的独立变量。结论:严重败血症患者接受重组人活化蛋白C并按产品标签定义的基线出血预防措施与没有出血预防措施的患者相比,发生严重出血事件和死亡的比率明显更高。这些数据表明严格遵守PROWESS试验排除标准将进一步限制与使用重组人活化蛋白C相关的严重出血事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号