...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >The impact of early monitored management on survival in hospitalized adult Ugandan patients with severe sepsis: A prospective intervention study
【24h】

The impact of early monitored management on survival in hospitalized adult Ugandan patients with severe sepsis: A prospective intervention study

机译:早期监测管理对重症败血症住院乌干达成年患者生存的影响:一项前瞻性干预研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In sub-Saharan Africa, sepsis is an important cause of mortality. Optimal sepsis management including fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic administration, and patient monitoring is limited by lack of supplies and skilled health workers. Objective: To evaluate whether early, monitored sepsis management provided by a study medical officer can improve survival among patients with severe sepsis admitted to two public hospitals in Uganda. Design, Setting, and Patients: A prospective before and after study of an intervention cohort (n = 426) with severe sepsis receiving early, monitored sepsis management compared to an observation cohort (n = 245) of similarly ill patients with severe sepsis receiving standard management after admission to the medical wards of two Ugandan hospitals. INTERVENTION:: Early sepsis management provided by a dedicated study medical officer comprising fluid resuscitation, early antibiotics, and regular monitoring in the first 6 hrs of hospitalization. Measurements: Kaplan-Meier survival and unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to compare the effect of early, monitored sepsis management on 30-day mortality between the intervention cohort (enrolled May 2008 to May 2009) and observation cohort (enrolled July 2006 to November 2006). Results: The majority (86%) of patients in both cohorts were human immuno-deficiency virus-infected. Median fluid volume provided in the first 6 hrs of hospitalization was higher in intervention than observation cohort patients (3000 mL vs. 500 mL, p < .001) and a greater proportion of intervention cohort patients received antibacterial therapy in <1 hr (67% vs. 30.4%, p < .001). Mortality at 30 days was significantly lower in the intervention cohort compared to the observation cohort (33.0% vs. 45.7%, log-rank p = .005). After adjustment for potential confounders, the hazard of 30-day mortality was 26% less in the intervention cohort compared to the observation cohort (adjusted hazards ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.98). Mortality among the 13% of intervention patients who developed signs of respiratory distress was associated with baseline illness severity rather than fluid volume administered. CONCLUSION:: Early, monitored management of severely septic patients in Uganda improves survival and is feasible and safe even in a busy public referral hospital.
机译:在撒哈拉以南非洲,败血症是导致死亡的重要原因。缺乏液体和熟练卫生工作者限制了败血症的最佳管理,包括液体复苏,早期抗生素管理和患者监测。目的:评估由研究医务人员提供的早期监测败血症管理是否可以改善乌干达两家公立医院收治的严重败血症患者的生存率。设计,环境和患者:与早期观察到的队列研究(n = 245)相比,对重症脓毒症接受早期,监测脓毒症治疗的干预队列(n = 245)与前瞻性研究的类似病例。进入乌干达两家医院的病房后进行管理。干预:早期的败血症管理由专门的研究医疗人员提供,包括液体复苏,早期抗生素和在住院的前6小时进行定期监测。测量:使用Kaplan-Meier生存率和未经调整的Cox比例风险分析法,比较干预队列(2008年5月至2009年5月)和观察队列(2006年7月入组)的早期监测败血症管理对30天死亡率的影响。至2006年11月)。结果:在这两个队列中,大多数患者(86%)被人类免疫缺陷病毒感染。住院前6小时提供的液体中位数在干预组比观察组高(3000 mL vs. 500 mL,p <.001),干预组在<1小时内接受抗菌治疗的比例更高(67% vs. 30.4%,p <.001)。与观察组相比,干预组的30天死亡率显着降低(33.0%对45.7%,对数秩p = .005)。调整潜在混杂因素后,干预组的30天死亡率比观察组低26%(调整后的危害比0.74,95%置信区间0.55-0.98)。在13%出现呼吸窘迫迹象的干预患者中,死亡率与基线疾病的严重程度有关,而不是与输液量有关。结论:乌干达对严重脓毒症患者进行早期,受监控的管理可以提高生存率,即使在繁忙的公立转诊医院中也是可行和安全的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号