...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation.
【24h】

Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation.

机译:静脉地尔硫卓在控制急性单纯性心房颤动患者心室率方面优于静脉使用胺碘酮或地高辛。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy of intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, and amiodarone for acute ventricular rate (VR) control in patients with acute symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF) necessitating hospitalization. DESIGN: Randomized control trial. SETTING: Acute emergency medical admission unit in a regional teaching hospital in Hong Kong. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty adult patients with acute AF and rapid VR (>120 bpm). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned in 1:1:1 ratio to receive intravenous diltiazem, digoxin, or amiodarone for VR control. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was sustained VR control (<90 bpm) within 24 hours; the secondary end points included AF symptom improvement and length of hospitalization. At 24 hours, VR control was achieved in 119 of 150 patients (79%). The time to VR control was significantly shorter among patients in the diltiazem group (log-rank test, p < 0.0001) with the percentage of patients who achieved VR control being higher in the diltiazem group (90%) than the digoxin group (74%) and the amiodarone group (74%). The median time to VR control was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3 hours, 1-21 hours) compared with the digoxin (6 hours, 3-15 hours, p < 0.001) and amiodarone groups (7 hours, 1-18 hours, p = 0.003). Furthermore, patients in the diltiazem group persistently had the lowest mean VR after the first hour of drug administration compared with the other two groups (p < 0.05). The diltiazem group had the largest reduction in AF symptom frequency score and severity score (p < 0.0001). In addition, length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the diltiazem group (3.9 +/- 1.6 days) compared with digoxin (4.7 +/- 2.1 days, p = 0.023) and amiodarone groups (4.7 +/- 2.2 days, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: As compared with digoxin and amiodarone, intravenous diltiazem was safe and effective in achieving VR control to improve symptoms and to reduce hospital stay in patients with acute AF.
机译:目的:比较静脉用地尔硫卓,地高辛和胺碘酮在需要住院的急性症状性心房颤动(AF)患者中控制急性心室率(VR)的临床疗效。设计:随机对照试验。地点:香港某地区教学医院的急诊科。患者:一百五十名患有急性房颤和快速VR(> 120 bpm)的成年患者。干预措施:以1:1:1的比例随机分配患者接受静脉地尔硫卓,地高辛或胺碘酮进行VR控制。测量和主要结果:主要终点是在24小时内持续进行VR控制(<90 bpm);次要终点包括房颤症状改善和住院时间。在24小时内,150例患者中有119例达到了VR控制(79%)。地尔硫卓组患者的VR控制时间显着缩短(对数秩检验,p <0.0001),地尔硫卓组(90%)达到VR控制的患者比例高于地高辛组(74%) )和胺碘酮组(74%)。与地高辛(6小时,3-15小时,p <0.001)和胺碘酮组(7小时,1-18小时)相比,地尔硫卓组(3小时,1-21小时)达到VR控制的中位时间明显缩短,p = 0.003)。此外,与其他两组相比,地尔硫卓组的患者在服药第一小时后的平均VR持续最低(p <0.05)。地尔硫卓组房颤症状频率评分和严重程度评分的降低幅度最大(p <0.0001)。此外,地高硫卓组(3.9 +/- 1.6天)的住院时间明显比地高辛(4.7 +/- 2.1天,p = 0.023)和胺碘酮组(4.7 +/- 2.2天,p = 0.038)。结论:与地高辛和胺碘酮相比,地尔硫卓静脉注射可安全有效地控制VR以改善急性房颤患者的症状并减少住院时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号