...
首页> 外文期刊>Contemporary clinical trials >Rationale and design of a comparative effectiveness trial of home- and clinic-based self-management support coaching for older adults with asthma
【24h】

Rationale and design of a comparative effectiveness trial of home- and clinic-based self-management support coaching for older adults with asthma

机译:基于家庭和诊所的自我管理支持对老年哮喘患者进行指导的比较有效性试验的原理和设计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Older adults with asthma face numerous barriers to effective self-management and asthma control, and experience worse outcomes than younger asthmatics. Yet, there have been no controlled trials of interventions specifically designed to improve their care and outcomes. Through a multi-stakeholder collaboration (patients, academia, community-based organizations, a state department of health, and an advocacy organization) we developed a multi-component asthma self-management support intervention to address the myriad psychosocial, functional, health status, and cognitive barriers to effective asthma self-management in adults ages 60 and older. We are recruiting 425 New Yorkers in Manhattan and the Bronx for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with 3 arms: the intervention delivered in primary care settings or in their home, or usual care. In the intervention, care coaches use a novel screening tool to identify the specific barriers to asthma control and self-management they experience. Once identified, the coach and patient choose from a menu of actions to address it. The intervention emphasizes efficiency, flexibility, shared decision making and goal setting, communication strategies appropriate for individuals with limited cognition and literacy skills, and ongoing reinforcement and support. Additionally, we introduced asthma-specific enhancements to the electronic health records of all participating clinical practices, including an asthma severity assessment, clinical decision support, and a patient-tailored asthma action plan. Patients will be followed for 12 months and interviewed at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months and data on emergency department visits and hospitalizations will be obtained through the New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:老年哮喘患者面临有效自我管理和哮喘控制的众多障碍,并且比年轻哮喘患者的结局更差。但是,还没有针对改善其护理和结果的干预措施的对照试验。通过多方利益相关者的协作(患者,学术界,社区组织,州卫生部门和倡导组织),我们开发了多成分哮喘自我管理支持干预措施,以解决无数的心理,功能,健康状况,和认知障碍对有效控制60岁以上成年人的哮喘的自我管理。我们正在曼哈顿和布朗克斯区招募425名纽约人,进行3项实用的随机对照试验:在基层医疗机构或其家中或常规医疗机构中进行干预。在干预中,护理教练使用新颖的筛查工具来确定他们所遇到的控制哮喘和自我管理的具体障碍。一旦确定,教练和病人将从动作菜单中进行选择以解决该问题。干预措施强调效率,灵活性,共同的决策和目标设定,适合认知和读写能力有限的个人的沟通策略,以及持续的强化和支持。此外,我们在所有参与的临床实践的电子健康记录中引入了针对哮喘的增强功能,包括哮喘严重程度评估,临床决策支持和针对患者的哮喘行动计划。将对患者进行12个月的随访,并在基线,3、6和12个月进行访谈,并将通过纽约州全州计划与研究合作系统获得急诊科就诊和住院的数据。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号