Indian potash contracts remain elusive as final Chinese deal settled

Fertilizer Week Group

首页> 外文期刊>Fertilizer Week >Indian potash contracts remain elusive as final Chinese deal settled

【24h】

Indian potash contracts remain elusive as final Chinese deal settled

机译：随着中国最终达成和解，印度钾肥合同仍然难以捉摸

获取原文

获取原文并翻译 | 示例

掌桥外文数据库（机构版） >>

开具论文收录证明 >>

文献代查 >>

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

The new Chinese contract has failed to strengthen spot potash markets; in fact some prices have continued to see falls this week while the wait for a new Indian contract drags on. This week, ICL signed the final yearly contract agreement to China for 2015. The company negotiated an impressive 1.1 million mt of firm volumes despite strikes continuing to hit production at their Dead Sea Works operations.

机译：新的中国合同未能加强钾肥现货市场。事实上，本周一些价格继续下跌，而等待新的印度合同的等待却继续。本周，ICL与中国签署了最终的年度合同协议，即2015年。尽管罢工在死海工厂运营中继续打击生产，但该公司仍谈判了令人印象深刻的110万吨公吨产量。

著录项

来源
《Fertilizer Week》 |2015年第23期|共3页
作者
Fertilizer Week Group;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
收录信息
原文格式 PDF
正文语种 eng
中图分类
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. Indian potash contracts remain elusive as final Chinese deal settled [J] . Fertilizer Week Group Fertilizer Week . 2015,第Apra23期

机译：随着中国最终达成和解，印度钾肥合同仍然难以捉摸
2. Indian thermal deals remain elusive [J] . Steve Hooks U.S. Coal Review . 2019,第2255期

机译：印度热量交易仍然难以捉摸
3. Indian enquiries for imported thermal coal rise, deals remain elusive [J] . Sapna Dogra, Anita Nugraha Platts Coal Trader International . 2013,第150期

机译：印度对进口动力煤的询盘上升，交易仍难以捉摸
4. Keynote: ELUCIDATING THE CHEMISTRY OF ELUSIVE GAS PHASE RADICALS USING DISTONIC RADICAL IONS: TRYING TO GET A GOOD DEAL FROM A FAUSTIAN BARGAIN [C] . Stephen Blanksby, David L. Marshall, Berwyck L. J. Poad, International Mass Spectrometry Conference . 2018

机译：主题演讲：使用扩张自由基离子阐明难以使气相自由基的化学方法：试图从浮士东讨价还价获得良好的交易
5. The Law Applicable to an International Contract of Sale in the Absence of a Choice of Law – A Comparative Study of Brazilian, Russian, Indian, Chinese and South African Private International Law [D] . Bouwers, Garth Jody. 2013

机译：在没有选择法律的情况下适用于国际销售合同的法律 - 巴西，俄罗斯，印度，中国和南非民办国际法的比较研究
6. The Brown Kelly-Paterson or Plummer-Vinson Syndrome: An Old Score Finally Settled [O] . S. D. Slater 1991

机译：布朗·凯利·帕特森（Brown Kelly-Paterson）或普兰默·温森综合症（Plummer-Vinson Syndrome）：一个古老的计分最终得以解决
7. Certain Simple, Unsolvable Problems of Group Theory. V 29,3029Parts I, II, III and IV have appeared in Series A, 57, Nos. 3 and 5; 58, Nos. 2 and 5 of these Proceedings, as well as Indag. Math., 16, Nos. 3 and 5 (1954); 17, Nos. 2 and 5 (1955).In Part I, page 234, the ninth and tenth lines following the displayed material, for both occurrences of A read D and for both occurrences of B read E: In part II, page 497, for all occurrences of M in Diagrams A and D read C. In Part IV, page 574, the third displayed line, for zαiLread z―αiL. 19).30The proof of the unsolvability of the word problem contained in this and subsequent paper is not contained in the dissertation Several simple unsolvable problems of group theory related to the word problem. (See footnote 1 of Part I.) Our proof was finally completed during the period 1954-56 while in residence at the Institute for Advanced Study. We were supported in 1954-55 directly by the Institute and in 1955-56 by National Science Foundation contract G-1974. Certain improvements were evolved ans preparations for publication were completed while the author held a Fulbright grant to the University of Oslo.Our thanks are due to Professor Kurt Gödel for his kind encouragement in these matter; certain related problems for study he has suggested we hope to deal with later. When an earlier version of Lemmas 30 and 31 was explained at a colloquium at the University of Michigan, August 3, 1956, Professor Roger Lyndon suggested an improvement which is incorporated in our present version. We are indeed indebted to Dr. John Addison and Dr. Michael Rabin for checking many of the new details during July of 1956.) [O] . Boone William W. 1957

机译：群体理论的某些简单，不可解决的问题。 V 29,3029 I，II，III和IV部分出现在A系列57、3和5号中； 58，第2和5号程序，以及Indag。 Math。，16，Nos 3 and 5（1954）; 》，第17卷，第2期和第5期（1955年）。在第一部分，第234页中，显示的材料之后的第九行和第十行，出现A读D和出现B都读E：在第二部分，第497页，对于图A和D中所有出现的M，请读C。在第Ⅳ部分，第574页中，第三行显示为zαiLreadz-αiL。 19）.30本论文及后续论文中所包含的单词问题的不可解性的证明不包含在本文中。（请参阅第I部分的脚注1。）我们的证明终于在1954-56年期间居住在高级研究所期间完成了。该研究所在1954-55年间直接为我们提供了支持，在1955-56年间得到了美国国家科学基金会的G-1974合同的支持。在作者获得奥斯陆大学富布赖特奖学金的同时，对出版物的改进和准备工作也有所进展。感谢库尔特·哥德尔教授在此方面的大力鼓励。他建议我们研究一些相关的问题，希望以后再解决。 1956年8月3日，在密歇根大学的一个座谈会上解释了Lemmas 30和31的早期版本时，Roger Lyndon教授建议进行改进，并将其纳入当前版本。我们确实要感谢John Addison博士和Michael Rabin博士在1956年7月检查了许多新细节。）

Indian potash contracts remain elusive as final Chinese deal settled

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅