...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of doripenem versus imipenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, randomized study.
【24h】

Efficacy and safety of intravenous infusion of doripenem versus imipenem in ventilator-associated pneumonia: a multicenter, randomized study.

机译:呼吸机相关性肺炎静脉注射多瑞培南和亚胺培南的疗效和安全性:一项多中心随机研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Doripenem is an investigational carbapenem with broad-spectrum activity against gram-negative and gram-positive pathogens, including multidrug-resistant strains, commonly responsible for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). This large, phase III study compared doripenem with imipenem for the treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia. DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, parallel randomized, active-controlled, open-label study. SETTING: Intensive care units. PATIENTS: Adults (N = 531) who met clinical and radiologic criteria for ventilator-associated pneumonia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were stratified by duration of mechanical ventilation (< 5 vs. > or = 5 days), severity of illness (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score < or 15 vs. > 15), and geographic region and then randomly assigned to doripenem 500 mg every 8 hrs via a 4-hr intravenous infusion or imipenem 500 mg every 6 hrs or 1000 mg every 8 hrs via 30- or 60-min intravenous infusions, respectively, for 7-14 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary efficacy end points were the clinical cure rates in the clinical modified intent-to-treat (cMITT) and clinically evaluable populations. Doripenem was noninferior to imipenem (lower boundary of 95% confidence interval around the difference between treatments > or -20%). Clinical cure rates were 68.3% (doripenem) and 64.2% (imipenem) in the clinically evaluable and 59.0% (doripenem) and 57.8% (imipenem) in the cMITT populations. In patients with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, clinical cure was 80.0% (doripenem) and 42.9% (imipenem) (p not significant); microbiological cure was 65.0% (doripenem) and 37.5% (imipenem). Only 18% (5 of 28) of P. aeruginosa isolates had minimum inhibitory concentration > or = 8 microg/mL at baseline or following therapy in the doripenem arm compared with 64% (16 of 25) in the imipenem treatment group (p = .001). Clinical cure rate was higher with doripenem than imipenem at higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores and older ages. Doripenem was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: In this large, phase III study of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia, a 4-hr intravenous infusion of doripenem was clinically efficacious and therapeutically noninferior to imipenem.
机译:目的:多瑞培南是一种研究型碳青霉烯,具有广谱活性,可抵抗革兰氏阴性和革兰氏阳性病原体,包括多药耐药菌株,通常与呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)有关。这项大型的III期研究比较了多立培南和亚胺培南在呼吸机相关性肺炎的治疗中的作用。设计:前瞻性,多中心,平行随机,主动控制,开放标签研究。地点:重症监护室。患者:符合呼吸机相关性肺炎临床和放射学标准的成年人(N = 531)。干预措施:按机械通气时间(<5 vs.>或= 5天),疾病严重程度(急性生理和慢性健康评估II得分<或15 vs.> 15)和地理区域对患者进行分层,然后随机分配通过4小时静脉输注每8小时服用多利培南500毫克,或者通过30或60分钟静脉输注每6小时服用亚胺培南500毫克每6小时或每8小时服用亚胺培南7-14天。测量和主要结果:主要疗效终点是临床改良意向性治疗(cMITT)和临床可评估人群的临床治愈率。多利培南不次于亚胺培南(95%置信区间的下边界,在两次治疗之间的差异>或-20%附近)。在临床可评估的临床治愈率分别为68.3%(doripenem)和64.2%(imipenem),在cMITT人群中为59.0%(doripenem)和57.8%(imipenem)。在铜绿假单胞菌患者中,临床治愈率为80.0%(多利培南)和42.9%(亚胺培南)(p不显着)。微生物治愈率为65.0%(多利培南)和37.5%(亚胺培南)。在基线或治疗后,多立培南组只有18%(28个中的5个)铜绿假单胞菌最低抑菌浓度>或= 8 microg / mL,相比之下,亚胺培南治疗组中则有64%(25个中的16个)(p = .001)。在较高的急性生理学和慢性健康评估II评分以及较高的年龄下,多利培南的临床治愈率高于亚胺培南。多瑞培南一般耐受良好。结论:在这项关于呼吸机相关性肺炎的大型,III期研究中,静脉内输注多瑞培南4小时在临床上有效且在治疗上不亚于亚胺培南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号