...
首页> 外文期刊>European Journal of Operational Research >An efficient envelope-based Branch and Bound algorithm for non-convex combined heat and power production planning
【24h】

An efficient envelope-based Branch and Bound algorithm for non-convex combined heat and power production planning

机译:一种有效的基于包络的分支定界算法,用于非凸面热电联产计划

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Combined heat and power (CHP) production is universally accepted as one of the most energy-efficient technologies to produce energy with lower fuel consumption and fewer emissions. In CHP technology, heat and power generation follow a joint characteristic. Traditional CHP production is usually applied in backpressure plants, where the joint characteristic can often be represented by a convex model. Advanced CHP production technologies such as backpressure plants with condensing and auxiliary cooling options, gas turbines, and combined gas and steam cycles may require non-convex models. Cost-efficient operation of a CHP system can be planned using an optimization model based on forecasts for heat load and power price. A long-term planning model decomposes into thousands of single-period models, which can be formulated in the convex case as linear programming (LP) problems, and in the non-convex case as mixed integer programming (MIP) problems. In this paper, we introduce EBB algorithm, for solving the non-convex single-period CHP models of a long-term planning problem under the deregulated power market. EBB is based on the Branch and Bound (B&B) algorithm where tight lower bounds are computed analytically for pruning the search tree and the LP sub-problems are solved through an efficient envelope-based dual algorithm. We compare the performance of EBB with realistic models against the ILOG CPLEX 9.0 MIP solver and the Power Simplex (PS)-based B&B algorithm (PBB). PS is an efficient specialized primal-based Simplex, algorithm developed for convex CHP planning problems. EBB is from 661 to 955 times (with average 785) faster than CPLEX and from 11 to 31 times (with average 24) faster than PBB. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:热电联产(CHP)生产被公认为是最节能的技术之一,可以生产燃料消耗更少,排放更少的能源。在热电联产技术中,热力发电具有共同的特征。传统的热电联产通常用于反压工厂,在这些工厂中,联合特征通常可以用凸模型表示。先进的CHP生产技术,例如带有冷凝和辅助冷却选件的背压设备,燃气轮机以及燃气和蒸汽联合循环,可能需要非凸面模型。可以使用基于热负荷和电价预测的优化模型来规划CHP系统的经济高效运行。长期计划模型分解为成千上万的单周期模型,可以在凸情况下表示为线性规划(LP)问题,在非凸情况下表示为混合整数规划(MIP)问题。在本文中,我们引入了EBB算法,用于解决电力市场放松管制下长期计划问题的非凸单周期CHP模型。 EBB基于分支定界(B&B)算法,其中通过精确计算下限以修剪搜索树,并通过基于有效包络的对偶算法解决LP子问题。我们将IBB CPLEX 9.0 MIP求解器和基于Power Simplex(PS)的B&B算法(PBB)与实际模型的EBB性能进行了比较。 PS是针对凸CHP规划问题而开发的一种有效的基于专业原始函数的单纯形算法。 EBB比CPLEX快661到955倍(平均785倍),比PBB快11到31倍(平均24倍)。 (c)2006 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号