...
首页> 外文期刊>Critical care medicine >Comparison of pulmonary artery and aortic transpulmonary thermodilution for monitoring of cardiac output in patients with severe heart failure: validation of a novel method.
【24h】

Comparison of pulmonary artery and aortic transpulmonary thermodilution for monitoring of cardiac output in patients with severe heart failure: validation of a novel method.

机译:比较肺动脉和主动脉经肺热稀释法监测严重心力衰竭患者的心输出量:一种新方法的验证。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Hemodynamic monitoring with the pulmonary artery catheter is frequently used in the management of severe heart failure. For measurement of cardiac output (CO), transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) has recently been adopted into clinical practice as an alternative to pulmonary artery thermodilution. However, no data have been published on the comparability of the two methods for patients with severely reduced left ventricular function. Our objective was to evaluate the correlation between these two methods of CO determination in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction. DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical study. SETTING: Cardiological intermediate care unit and medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Twenty-nine patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <35% and symptoms of heart failure (New York Heart Association class III-IV). INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The two methods of intermittent CO measurement were compared by simultaneously recording the results of pulmonary artery thermodilution and TPTD after injection of a cold saline bolus. Measurements were performed when clinically necessary. A total of 325 data pairs were analyzed. Mean CO of both methods was 4.4 L/min with a bias of 0.45 L/min (2 SD 1.20 L/min), resulting in a percentage error of 27.3%. CONCLUSION: In patients with severely impaired left ventricular function, measurement of CO by TPTD provides valid results.
机译:目的:肺动脉导管的血流动力学监测常用于严重心力衰竭的治疗。为了测量心输出量(CO),最近已将经肺热稀释(TPTD)替代肺动脉热稀释用于临床实践。但是,尚无关于两种方法对左室功能严重降低的患者的可比性的数据。我们的目标是评估严重左心功能不全患者这两种CO含量测定方法之间的相关性。设计:前瞻性观察性临床研究。地点:大学医院的心脏病中级监护室和重症监护室。患者:29名左心室射血分数<35%且有心力衰竭症状的患者(纽约心脏协会III-IV级)。干预:无。测量和主要结果:比较了两种间歇性CO测量方法,同时记录了冷盐水推注后肺动脉热稀释和TPTD的结果。在临床上必要时进行测量。总共分析了325个数据对。两种方法的平均CO均为4.4 L / min,偏差为0.45 L / min(2 SD 1.20 L / min),导致百分比误差为27.3%。结论:对于左心功能严重受损的患者,通过TPTD测量CO可提供有效的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号