首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics >Concurrent Chemo-Radiation With or Without Induction Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel: A Randomized, Phase 2/3 Trial in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
【24h】

Concurrent Chemo-Radiation With or Without Induction Gemcitabine, Carboplatin, and Paclitaxel: A Randomized, Phase 2/3 Trial in Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

机译:具有或不具有诱导性吉西他滨,卡铂和紫杉醇的同时化学放射治疗:局部晚期鼻咽癌的随机2/3期试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare survival, tumor control, toxicities, and quality of life of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( NPC) treated with induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemo- radiation ( CCRT), against CCRT alone. Patients and Methods: Patients were stratified by N stage and randomized to induction GCP ( 3 cycles of gemcitabine 1000 mg/ m 2, carboplatin area under the concentration- time- curve 2.5, and paclitaxel 70 mg/ m 2 given days 1 and 8 every 21 days) followed by CCRT ( radiation therapy 69.96 Gy with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/ m 2), or CCRT alone. The accrual of 172 was planned to detect a 15% difference in 5- year overall survival ( OS) with a 5% significance level and 80% power. Results: Between September 2004 and August 2012, 180 patients were accrued, and 172 ( GCP 86, control 86) were analyzed by intention to treat. There was no significant difference in OS ( 3- year OS 94.3% [ GCP] vs 92.3% [ control]; hazard ratio 1.05; 1- sided PZ. 494]), disease- free survival ( hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.44- 1.35, PZ. 362), and distant metastasesefree survival ( hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.38- 1.67, PZ. 547) between the 2 arms. Treatment compliance in the induction phase was good, but the relative dose intensity for concurrent cisplatin was significantly lower in the GCP arm. Overall, the GCP arm had higher rates of grades 3 and 4 leukopenia ( 52% vs 37%) and neutropenia ( 24% vs 12%), but grade 3 and 4 acute radiation toxicities were not statistically different between the 2 arms. The global quality of life scores were comparable in both arms. Conclusion: Induction chemotherapy with GCP before concurrent chemo- irradiation did not improve survival in locally advanced NPC. 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:目的:比较单独使用CCRT的局部诱导化疗和同期化学放疗(CCRT)治疗的局部晚期鼻咽癌(NPC)患者的生存,肿瘤控制,毒性和生活质量。患者和方法:将患者按N期分层,随机分为诱导GCP(3个周期的吉西他滨1000 mg / m 2,浓度-时间曲线2.5下的卡铂面积和紫杉醇70 mg / m 2,分别在第1天和第8天21天),然后进行CCRT(放射治疗69.96 Gy,每周顺铂40 mg / m 2),或单独进行CCRT。计划增加172个,以检测5%显着性水平和80%功效的5年总生存率(OS)的15%差异。结果:在2004年9月至2012年8月之间,共计有180例患者,按治疗意向分析了172例(GCP 86,对照86)。 OS,无病生存期(3年OS 94.3%[GCP] vs 92.3%[对照组];危险比1.05; 1面PZ。494]无显着差异(危险比0.77,95%置信区间)两臂之间的距离为0.44-1.35,PZ.362)和远距离无转移生存期(危险比0.80,95%置信区间0.38-1.67,PZ.547)。诱导期的治疗依从性良好,但在GCP组中并发顺铂的相对剂量强度明显降低。总体而言,GCP组的3级和4级白细胞减少症发生率较高(分别为52%和37%)和中性粒细胞减少症(24%对12%),但是2组之间的3级和4级急性放射毒性没有统计学差异。全球生活质量得分在两个方面都相当。结论:在同时进行化学辐照之前采用GCP诱导化疗不能提高局部晚期NPC的生存率。 2015 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号