首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial
【24h】

No sex for science? Formative research on the acceptability and feasibility of a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial

机译:科学没有性吗?真正避孕功效临床试验的可接受性和可行性的形成性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Recruitment challenges and restrictions on intercourse frequency and timing have stymied previous attempts to implement true contraceptive efficacy clinical trials. Study Design: Qualitative research was conducted in Madagascar, South Africa, and the United States to explore the acceptability of three potential true contraceptive efficacy study designs and the feasibility of recruitment for such trials, including characteristics of potential participants who may be willing to join. Results: Participants preferred the study design with the least restrictive sex criteria: participants have sex with assigned contraceptive methodo method on days around ovulation and use condoms on other days. Participants suggested that condom adherence would be low. Differences were noted across sites on whether female participants should be actively seeking pregnancy or not actively seeking pregnancy but willing to accept a pregnancy. Recruitment of participants was expected to be difficult. Conclusions: Data suggest that a true contraceptive efficacy clinical trial may not be feasible at this time in these settings.
机译:背景:招聘挑战以及性交频率和时机的限制阻碍了以往实施真正避孕功效临床试验的尝试。研究设计:在马达加斯加,南非和美国进行了定性研究,以探讨三种潜在的真正避孕功效研究设计的可接受性以及此类试验招募的可行性,包括可能愿意参加的参与者的特征。结果:参与者更倾向于采用性别限制最少的研究设计:参与者在排卵前后的某天使用指定的避孕方法/无避孕方法进行性行为,并在其他日子使用避孕套。参与者建议安全套依从性较低。在各个地点都注意到女性参与者是应该积极寻求怀孕还是不积极寻求怀孕但愿意接受怀孕的差异。预计招募参与者很困难。结论:数据表明,在这些情况下,目前尚无法进行真正的避孕功效临床试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号