首页> 外文期刊>Contraception >One versus multiple packs for women starting oral contraceptive pills: a comparison of two distribution regimens.
【24h】

One versus multiple packs for women starting oral contraceptive pills: a comparison of two distribution regimens.

机译:开始口服避孕药的妇女一包或多包:两种分配方案的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Despite World Health Organization and International Planned Parenthood Federation recommendations to provide multiple pill cycles to new users, many programs in developing countries still give only one pill cycle to new acceptors. STUDY DESIGN: To compare provision of a single versus multiple packs of pills, new pill users in 20 matched public sector clinics in Jamaica were assigned to one of two pill regimens in which they received either one (then subsequently three) or four pill cycles at method initiation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women who used pills beyond 4 months. RESULTS: Among 655 women, those receiving one cycle of pills at initiation, followed by counseling and a three-pack resupply, were no more likely to be using pills after 4 months than women who received four packs at initiation (odds ratio=1.33; 95% confidence interval=0.88-2.0). In both pill regimen groups, returning late to the clinic for resupply was a problem. However, more women in the 1+3-pack regimen group returned late to study clinics to obtain their fifth cycle of pills than their counterparts in the 4-pack regimen group (53% vs. 28%). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the recommendation that pill users should be given more than one cycle to start, because an extra visit for resupply contributes to clinic and provider costs. Moreover, providing more pill cycles at initiation would decrease the likelihood that women experience a gap in pill use between cycles.
机译:背景:尽管世界卫生组织和国际计划生育联合会建议为新使用者提供多个药丸周期,但发展中国家的许多计划仍仅给新接受者一个药丸周期。研究设计:为了比较单药和多药的提供情况,在牙买加的20个相匹配的公共部门诊所中,新药使用者被分配到两种药方案中的一种,在此方案中,他们接受了一个(然后是三个)或四个药周期方法启动。主要结果是使用药超过4个月的女性比例。结果:在655名妇女中,与开始时接受4包药的妇女相比,在开始时接受一个周期的药丸,随后的咨询和三包再补给的妇女与在开始时接受四包药的妇女相比不太可能使用药丸(几率= 1.33; 95%置信区间= 0.88-2.0)。在两个药丸治疗方案组中,晚点回到诊所补给都是一个问题。但是,与4包方案组的女性相比,在1 + 3包方案组中,有更多女性较晚返回研究诊所接受第五轮药丸治疗(53%比28%)。结论:我们的发现支持建议给丸药使用者一个以上的周期开始的建议,因为额外补给会增加临床和提供者的费用。此外,在开始时提供更多的药丸周期将减少妇女在两个周期之间服用药丸之间出现差距的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号