...
首页> 外文期刊>Anticancer Research: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >A New-Generation Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Is Superior to Quaiac-based Test in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia Among Colonoscopy Referral Patients
【24h】

A New-Generation Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Is Superior to Quaiac-based Test in Detecting Colorectal Neoplasia Among Colonoscopy Referral Patients

机译:新一代粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)在基于结肠镜检查的转诊患者中检测大肠肿瘤时优于基于Quaiac的测试

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Aim: To compare a new-generation fecal immunochemical test (FIT) with the leading guaiac-based test in detection of fecal occult blood (FOB) in colonoscopy-referral patients. Patients and Methods: A cohort of 300 patients referred for colonoscopy was examined by two different tests for FOB: ColonView quick test (CV) (FIT test for haemoglobin (Hb) and haemoglobin/haptoglobin (Hb/Hp) complex) and HemoccultSENSA (HS) (quaiac test for Hb). Three fecal samples were tested and all subjects were examined by diagnostic colonoscopy with biopsy verification. The test was interpreted positive if any of the three samples tested positive for Hb (HS test) and either Hb or Hb/Hp complex (CV test). The performance indicators (sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and area under the curve (AUC)) were calculated for both tests using three endpoints (adenoma (A), adenoma/carcinoma (A/AC) and carcinoma (AC)), collectively and were stratified according to tumor site. The two tests were compared regarding their sensitivity/specificity balance (AUC), using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) comparison test. Results: Colonoscopy (and biopsies) disclosed normal results in 85 (27.2%) subjects, A in 91 cases (30.3%) and AC in 95 (31.7%) patients. For the combined A+AC endpoint, the HS test had SE of 58.3% and SP of 96.5% (AUC=0.774), while the CV test had 97.2% SE and 85.8% SP (AUC=0.916) (p=0.0001). For the A endpoint, the difference between HS and CV was even more significant, AUC=0.637 and AUC=0.898, respectively (p=0.0001). In CV test, the Hb/Hp complex was 15% (93% vs. 78%) and 8% (96% vs. 88%) more sensitive than Hb alone, for the A and A+AC endpoints, respectively. Being more stable than Hb in the feces, the Hb/Hp complex detected 100% of the tumors in the proximal colon, as contrasted to only 41.2% and 52.9% by the Hb of HS and CV test, respectively (p=0.0001). Conclusions: With its 100% SE and 95.3% SP for proximal colon neoplasia, as well as 98.2% SE and 95.3% SP for the distal neoplasia, ColonView is superior to current FIT tests on the market, recently shown to exhibit pooled SE of 79% and pooled SP of 94% for colorectal cancer (CRC) in a comprehensive meta-analysis. With these exceptional performance indicators, ColonView quick test should be the test-of-choice for CRC screening.
机译:目的:比较新一代粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)和领先的愈创木脂测试,以检测结肠镜检查转诊患者的粪便潜血(FOB)。患者和方法:通过两种不同的FOB测试检查了300名接受结肠镜检查的患者队列:ColonView快速测试(CV)(针对血红蛋白(Hb)和血红蛋白/触珠蛋白(Hb / Hp)复合物的FIT测试)和HemoccultSENSA(HS )(对Hb的准测试)。测试了三个粪便样品,并通过诊断性结肠镜检查和活检验证对所有受试者进行了检查。如果三个样品中的任何一个对Hb(HS测试)和Hb或Hb / Hp复合物(CV测试)呈阳性,则该测试被解释为阳性。两种测试的性能指标(敏感性(SE),特异性(SP),阳性预测值(PPV),阴性预测值(NPV)和曲线下面积(AUC))均使用三个终点(腺瘤(A),腺瘤/癌(A / AC)和癌(AC)),并根据肿瘤部位分层。使用接收器工作特性(ROC)比较测试比较了这两种测试的敏感性/特异性平衡(AUC)。结果:结肠镜检查(和活组织检查)显示85例(27.2%)受试者的正常结果,A例91例(30.3%),AC例95例(31.7%)。对于A + AC组合终点,HS测试的SE为58.3%,SP为96.5%(AUC = 0.774),而CV测试的SE为97.2%,SP为85.8%(AUC = 0.916)(p = 0.0001)。对于A终点,HS和CV之间的差异甚至更大,分别为AUC = 0.637和AUC = 0.898(p = 0.0001)。在CV测试中,对于A和A + AC终点,Hb / Hp复合物的敏感性分别比单独的Hb高15%(93%对78%)和8%(96%对88%)。 Hb / Hp复合物在粪便中比Hb稳定,在近端结肠中检出100%的肿瘤,而HS和CV测试的Hb分别仅为41.2%和52.9%(p = 0.0001)。结论:ColonView具有100%的SE和95.3%的SP用于近端结肠瘤,以及98.2%的SE和95.3%的SP用于远处结肠瘤,优于目前市场上的FIT测试,最近显示其合并SE为79全面的荟萃分析中,结直肠癌(CRC)的SP%为94%,合并的SP为94%。凭借这些出色的性能指标,ColonView快速测试应成为CRC筛查的首选。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号