首页> 外文期刊>Applied mathematics and computation >Heuristics for no-wait flowshops with makespan subject to mean completion time
【24h】

Heuristics for no-wait flowshops with makespan subject to mean completion time

机译:带有等待时间的平均等待时间的无等待流程车间的启发式方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper addresses the m-machine no-wait flowshop scheduling problem. Two performance measures are considered; makespan and mean completion time. The objective is to find a sequence that minimizes makespan such that mean completion time is not greater than a certain value. In case such a certain value is not known, an algorithm is presented to find an upper bound on the mean completion time. A heuristic, called HA, a simulated annealing (SA) heuristic, a modified simulated annealing (mSA) heuristic, and two more heuristics, called HH1 and HH2, which are combination of HA and mSA, are proposed for the problem. The proposed heuristics are assessed on randomly generated problems with different number of jobs and machines. Computational experiments revealed that the overall average relative errors of SA, HA, mSA, HH1 and HH2, were 2.99, 1.33, 0.78, 0.04, and 0.87, respectively. These results are also statistically verified. Therefore, the heuristic HH1 significantly outperforms the other heuristics.
机译:本文解决了m机无等待流水车间调度问题。考虑了两个绩效指标;完成时间和平均完成时间。目的是找到最小化制造期的序列,以使平均完成时间不大于特定值。如果未知某个确定值,则提出一种算法以找到平均完成时间的上限。针对此问题,提出了一种启发式方法,称为HA,一种模拟退火(SA)启发式方法,一种改进的模拟退火(mSA)启发式方法,以及另外两种启发式方法,称为HH1和HH2,它们是HA和mSA的组合。建议的启发式方法是根据具有不同数量的作业和机器的随机生成的问题进行评估的。计算实验表明,SA,HA,mSA,HH1和HH2的总体平均相对误差分别为2.99、1.33、0.78、0.04和0.87。这些结果也经过统计验证。因此,启发式HH1明显优于其他启发式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号