...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >The acute effect of atrioventricular pacing on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with normal and depressed left ventricular function
【24h】

The acute effect of atrioventricular pacing on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with normal and depressed left ventricular function

机译:房室起搏对左室功能正常和抑郁的患者交感神经活动的急性影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

First published June 27, 2008; doi:10.1152/ajpheart.91404.2007.-Although modest elevations in pacing rate improve cardiac output and induce reflex sympathoinhibition, the threshold rate above which hemodynamic perturbations induce reflex sympathoexcitation remains unknown Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressures (MAP) and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) were measured during normal sinus rhythm (NSR) and atrioventricular (AV) sequential pacing in 25 patients. Pacing was performed at 100, 120, and 140 beats/min with an AV interval of 100 ms. Patients were divided into two groups based on normal or abnormal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): group 1 (n = 11; mean LVEF 55%) and group 2 (n = 14; mean LVEF, 31%). In group 1, relative to NSR, SBP decreased an average of 2%, 3%, and 8% at 100 120 and 140 beats/min (P < 0.001), respectively. DBP and MAP increased 9%, 15%, and 15% (P = 0.001) and 3%, 6%, and 5% [P = not significant (NS)L respectively. In group 2, SBP reductions were even greater, with an average decrease of 4%, 8%, and 16% (P < 0.001). Whereas DBP increased 9%, 9%, and 8% at 100, 120 and 140 beats/min (P = NS), MAP increased 3% and 2% at 100'and 120 beats/min but decreased 3% at 140 beats/min (P = 0.001) SNA recordings were obtained in 11 patients (6 in group 1 and 5 in group 2). In group ), SNA decreased during all rates, with a mean 21% reduction. In group 2, however, SNA decreased at 100 and 120 beats/min (49% and 38%) but increased 24% at 140 beats/min Patients with depressed LVEF exhibited altered hemodynamic and sympathetic responses to rapid sequential pacing. The implications of these findings in device programming and arrhythmia rate control await future studies.
机译:首次发布于2008年6月27日; doi:10.1152 / ajpheart.91404.2007.-尽管适度提高起搏率可改善心排血量并引起反射性交感神经抑制,但血流动力学扰动引起反射性交感神经兴奋的阈值率仍未知收缩压(SBP),舒张压(DBP)和平均25例患者在正常窦性心律(NSR)和房室(AV)连续起搏期间测量了动脉压(MAP)和交感神经活动(SNA)。起搏速度为100、120和140次/分钟,AV间隔为100毫秒。根据正常或异常左心室射血分数(LVEF)将患者分为两组:第1组(n = 11;平均LVEF 55%)和第2组(n = 14;平均LVEF,31%)。在第1组中,相对于NSR,SBP在100120和140次/ min时分别平均下降2%,3%和8%(P <0.001)。 DBP和MAP分别增加9%,15%和15%(P = 0.001)和3%,6%和5%[P =不显着(NS)L。在第2组中,SBP下降幅度更大,平均下降幅度分别为4%,8%和16%(P <0.001)。而DBP在100、120和140拍/分钟下分别增加9%,9%和8%(P = NS),而在100'和120拍/分钟下MAP分别增加3%和2%,但在140拍/下则降低3% min(P = 0.001)在11例患者中获得SNA记录(第1组为6个,第2组为5个)。 )组中,SNA在所有速率下均下降,平均下降21%。然而,在第2组中,SNA以100和120次/分钟的速度下降(49%和38%),但以140次/分钟的速度增加24%,LVEF降低的患者表现出对快速连续起搏的血流动力学和交感反应改变。这些发现对器械编程和心律失常率控制的意义尚待进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号