...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >A simplified two-component model of blood pressure fluctuation.
【24h】

A simplified two-component model of blood pressure fluctuation.

机译:简化的血压波动两成分模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We propose a simple moving-average (MA) model that uses the low-frequency (LF) component of the peroneal muscle sympathetic nerve spike rate (LF(spike rate)) and the high-frequency (HF) component of respiration (HF(Resp)) to describe the LF neurovascular fluctuations and the HF mechanical oscillations in systolic blood pressure (SBP), respectively. This method was validated by data from eight healthy subjects (23-47 yr old, 6 male, 2 female) during a graded tilt (15 degrees increments every 5 min to a 60 degrees angle). The LF component of SBP (LF(SBP)) had a strong baroreflex-mediated feedback correlation with LF(spike rate) (r = -0.69 +/- 0.05) and also a strong feedforward relation to LF(spike rate) [r = 0.58 +/- 0.03 with LF(SBP) delay (tau) = 5.625 +/- 0.15 s]. The HF components of spike rate (HF(spike rate)) and SBP (HF(SBP)) were not significantly correlated. Conversely, HF(Resp) and HF(SBP) were highly correlated (r = -0.79 +/- 0.04), whereas LF(Resp) and LF(SBP) were significantly less correlated (r = 0.45 +/- 0.08). The mean correlation coefficients between the measured and model-predicted LF(SBP) (r = 0.74 +/- 0.03) in the supine position did not change significantly during tilt. The mean correlation between the measured and model-predicted HF(SBP) was 0.89 +/- 0.02 in the supine position. R(2) values for the regression analysis of the model-predicted and measured LF and HF powers indicate that 78 and 91% of the variability in power can be explained by the linear relation of LF(spike rate) to LF(SBP) and HF(Resp) to HF(SBP). We report a simple two-component model using neural sympathetic and mechanical respiratory inputs that can explain the majority of blood pressure fluctuation at rest and during orthostatic stress in healthy subjects.
机译:我们提出了一种简单的移动平均(MA)模型,该模型使用了腓骨肌肉交感神经峰值频率(LF(spike rate))的低频(LF)分量和呼吸频率(HF(分别)来描述收缩压(SBP)中的LF神经血管波动和HF机械振荡。该方法已通过来自八名健康受试者(23-47岁,6名男性,2名女性)在分级倾斜(每5分钟以15度递增至60度角)期间的数据验证。 SBP的LF分量(LF(SBP))与LF(峰值速率)的压力反射介导的反馈相关性很强(r = -0.69 +/- 0.05),并且与LF(峰值速率)的前馈关系也很强[r = 0.58 +/- 0.03,LF(SBP)延迟(tau)= 5.625 +/- 0.15 s]。尖峰率(HF(spike rate))和SBP(HF(SBP))的HF分量无显着相关。相反,HF(Resp)和HF(SBP)的相关性高(r = -0.79 +/- 0.04),而LF(Resp)和LF(SBP)的相关性则低得多(r = 0.45 +/- 0.08)。在倾斜过程中,仰卧位的测量和模型预测的LF(SBP)(r = 0.74 +/- 0.03)之间的平均相关系数没有明显变化。仰卧位测量和模型预测的HF(SBP)之间的平均相关性为0.89 +/- 0.02。对模型预测和测量的LF和HF功率进行回归分析的R(2)值表明,功率的可变性的78%和91%可以通过LF(峰值率)与LF(SBP)和HF(Resp)至HF(SBP)。我们报告了使用神经交感神经和机械呼吸输入的简单两成分模型,该模型可以解释健康受试者静息时和体位压力时的大多数血压波动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号