...
首页> 外文期刊>American Journal of Physiology >NO-independent mechanism mediates tempol-induced renal vasodilation in SHR.
【24h】

NO-independent mechanism mediates tempol-induced renal vasodilation in SHR.

机译:NO独立机制介导SHR中tempol诱导的肾血管舒张。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigated whether tempol, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, affected renal hemodynamics and arterial pressure in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. We also examined whether tempol affected exaggerated renal vasoconstrictor responses to ANG II in SHR. To test whether the effects of tempol were due to a restored NO system, we used the NOS inhibitor N(w)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Renal blood flow (RBF) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured in vivo by electromagnetic flowmetry and arterial catheterization in 10- to 12-wk-old anesthetized SHR and SD rats. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) was measured in conscious rats using the tail cuff method. Tempol (1 mM) was given in the drinking water to SD (SD-T) and SHR (SHR-T) for 5-7 days for RBF measurements and for 15 days for SAP measurements. Age-matched SD (SD-C) and SHR (SHR-C) were used as controls. ANG II (1-4 ng) was administered as a bolus via a renal artery catheter. L-NAME was administered intravenously for 15-20 min. Renal vascular resistance (RVR) was elevated in SHR-C compared with SD-C. In SHR-T, baseline RVR was not different from SD-C and SD-T rats. Tempol had no effect on RVR in SD. L-NAME elevated RVR to the same extent in all four groups. Arterial pressure was not affected by tempol. The RVR responses to ANG II were higher in SHR-C than in the SD-C group. ANG II responses were not different between SHR-T and SD-T. Overall, tempol reduced the renovascular responses to ANG II in SHR. L-NAME elevated the effects of ANG II in SD-C rats but had no effect on the ANG II responses in the other groups. Thus L-NAME treatment did not influence tempol's effects on baseline RVR or ANG II responses. We conclude that in SHR, tempol has a significant renal vasodilator effect and that it normalizes the increased renovascular ANG II sensitivity. As the effects of L-NAME are not greater in SHR-T rats, it is not likely that the elevated renal resistance and ANG II sensitivity in SHR are due to reactive oxygen species-induced quenching of nitric oxide.
机译:我们调查了自发性高血压大鼠(SHR)和Sprague-Dawley(SD)大鼠中的超氧化物歧化酶模拟物tempol是否会影响肾脏血液动力学和动脉压。我们还检查了tempol是否会影响SHR中对ANG II的过度的肾血管收缩反应。为了测试tempol的作用是否归因于还原的NO系统,我们使用了NOS抑制剂N(w)-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME)。在10至12周龄的麻醉SHR和SD大鼠中,通过电磁流量计和动脉导管术在体内测量了肾血流量(RBF)和平均动脉压(MAP)。使用尾套法测量清醒大鼠的收缩期动脉压(SAP)。在饮用水中将Tempol(1 mM)用于SD(SD-T)和SHR(SHR-T),用于RBF测量5-7天,用于SAP测量15天。使用年龄匹配的SD(SD-C)和SHR(SHR-C)作为对照。 ANG II(1-4 ng)通过肾动脉导管推注。 L-NAME静脉给药15-20分钟。与SD-C相比,SHR-C的肾血管阻力(RVR)升高。在SHR-T中,基线RVR与SD-C和SD-T大鼠没有区别。 Tempol对SD中的RVR没有影响。 L-NAME在所有四个组中均将RVR升高至相同程度。动脉压力不受tempol影响。 SHR-C组对ANG II的RVR反应高于SD-C组。 ANG II反应在SHR-T和SD-T之间没有差异。总体而言,tempol降低了SHR对ANG II的肾血管反应。 L-NAME增加了SD-C大鼠的ANG II的作用,但对其他组的ANG II反应无影响。因此,L-NAME治疗不影响tempol对基线RVR或ANG II应答的作用。我们得出的结论是,在SHR中,tempol具有显着的肾血管舒张作用,并且可以使增加的肾血管ANG II敏感性正常化。由于L-NAME在SHR-T大鼠中的作用并不大,因此SHR中较高的肾脏抵抗力和ANG II敏感性不太可能归因于活性氧诱导的一氧化氮猝灭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号