...
首页> 外文期刊>Acta Horticulturae >High density pear production with Pyrus communis rootstocks.
【24h】

High density pear production with Pyrus communis rootstocks.

机译:利用梨(Pyrus communis)砧木生产高密度梨。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A field trial at Geneva, New York, United States compared four training systems/densities [Central Leader (598 trees/ha), Vertical Axis (1281 trees/ha), Tall Spindle (2243 trees/ha) and Super Spindle (5382 trees/ha)] on 6 rootstocks (seedling, OHF97, OHF87, Pyrodwarf, Pyro2-33 and Quince A) with 3 cultivars ('Bartlett', 'Bosc' and 'Taylor's Gold Comice'). After eight years, tree density had a negative effect on tree size with trees at the highest planting density being only 60% the size of the trees at the lowest planting density. With 'Bartlett', the largest trees were on OHF97 followed by OHF87, Pyro2-33, Pyrodwarf and the smallest trees were on Quince A. With 'Bosc' the largest trees were on OHF87. Trees of 'Taylor's Gold' on OHF97 and on seedling were damaged in the winter of 2004/05 with 37% of the scions killed. None of the other rootstocks were damaged. Tree density had a large positive effect on cumulative yield, while rootstock genotype had a much smaller effect. The high-density Super Spindle system had 5 times the cumulative yield as the low-density central leader system. With 'Bosc' there was little effect of rootstock, but with 'Bartlett', OHF97 and OHF87 had the highest cumulative yield at each density. Quince A had the lowest yield at all densities. Pyrodwarf and Pyro 2-33 had similar intermediate yields at all densities, but Pyrodwarf had numerous root suckers. Yield efficiency was not largely affected by planting density or rootstock genotype although there was a slight negative relationship between planting density and yield efficiency. Fruit size was negatively related to planting density with the Super Spindle system producing significantly smaller fruit size than other systems. Part of the effect was due to greater crop loads on the Super Spindle system. However, when fruit size was adjusted for crop load there was still a negative effect of planting density on fruit size. With 'Bartlett', Quince A produced the largest fruit size, while Pyrodwarf and seedling had significantly smaller size. With 'Bosc' and 'Taylor's Gold' there was no effect of rootstock on fruit size.
机译:在美国纽约的日内瓦进行的一项现场试验比较了四种培训系统/密度[中央领导(598棵树/公顷),垂直轴(1281棵树/公顷),高纺锤(2243棵树/公顷)和超级纺锤(5382棵树) / ha)]上有3个品种('Bartlett','Bosc'和'Taylor's Gold Comice')的6种砧木(种苗,OHF97,OHF87,Pyrodwarf,Pyro2-33和Quince A)。八年后,树木密度对树木大小产生负面影响,最高种植密度的树木仅是最低种植密度的树木大小的60%。对于“ Bartlett”,最大的树在OHF97上,其次是OHF87,Pyro2-33,Pyrodwarf,最小的树在Quince A上。对于“ Bosc”,最大的树在OHF87上。 OHF97和幼苗上的“泰勒金”树在2004/05冬季遭到破坏,杀死了37%的接穗。其他砧木均未受损。树木密度对累积产量有很大的积极影响,而砧木基因型的影响则小得多。高密度超级主轴系统的累积产量是低密度中央引导系统的5倍。使用“ Bosc”时,砧木几乎没有影响,但是使用“ Bartlett”时,OHF97和OHF87在每种密度下的累积产量最高。在所有密度下,木瓜A的产量最低。在所有密度下,Pyrodwarf和Pyro 2-33的中间产量相似,但是Pyrodwarf的根吸盘很多。种植密度或砧木基因型对产量效率的影响不大,尽管种植密度与产量效率之间存在轻微的负相关关系。超级纺锤系统的果实大小与种植密度呈负相关,而超级纺锤系统的果实大小明显小于其他系统。部分原因是由于超级主轴系统上的农作物负荷增加。但是,当根据作物负荷调整果实大小时,种植密度仍然对果实大小产生负面影响。用'Bartlett',木瓜A产生最大的果实大小,而Pyrodwarf和幼苗的果实明显小得多。使用“ Bosc”和“ Taylor's Gold”时,砧木对果实大小没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号