首页> 外文期刊>Conservation Biology >A Landholder-Based Approach to the Design of Private-Land Conservation Programs
【24h】

A Landholder-Based Approach to the Design of Private-Land Conservation Programs

机译:基于土地所有者的私有土地保护计划设计方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Many ecosystems exist primarily, or solely, on privately owned (freehold) or managed (leasehold) land. In rural and semirural areas, local and regional government agencies are commonly responsible for encouraging landholders to conserve native vegetation and species on these private properties. Yet these agencies often lack the capacity to design and implement conservation programs tailored to rural and semirural landholdings and instead offer one program to all landholders. Landholders may elect not to participate because the program is irrelevant to their property or personal needs; consequently, vegetation-retention objectives may not be achieved. We differentiated landholders in Queensland, Australia, according to whether they derived income from the land (production landholders) or not (nonproduction landholders). We compared these two groups to identify similarities and differences that may inform the use of policy instruments (e.g., voluntary, economic, and regulatory) in conservation program design. We interviewed 45 landholders participating in three different conservation agreement programs (price-based rate [property tax] rebate; market-based tender; and voluntary, permanent covenant). Production landholders were more likely to participate in short-term programs that offered large financial incentives that applied to <25% of their property. Nonproduction landholders were more likely to participate in long-term programs that were voluntary or offered small financial incentives that applied to >75% of their property. These results may be explained by significant differences in the personal circumstances of production and nonproduction landholders (income, education, health) and differences in their norms (beliefs about how an individual is expected to act) and attitudes. Knowledge of these differences may allow for development of conservation programs that better meet the needs of landholders and thus increase participation in conservation programs and retention of native vegetation.
机译:许多生态系统主要或仅存在于私有(永久业权)或管理(租赁)土地上。在农村和半农村地区,地方政府和地方政府机构通常负责鼓励土地所有者在这些私有财产上保护本地植被和物种。然而,这些机构通常缺乏设计和实施针对农村和半农村土地所有权的保护计划的能力,而是向所有土地所有者提供一项计划。土地所有者可以选择不参加,因为该计划与他们的财产或个人需求无关;因此,可能无法实现植被保留目标。我们根据澳大利亚昆士兰州的土地所有者(生产土地所有者)或非土地生产者(非生产土地所有者)的收入来进行区分。我们比较了这两个群体,以确定可能有助于在保护计划设计中使用政策手段(例如自愿,经济和监管)的异同。我们采访了参与三个不同保护协议计划的45位土地所有者(基于价格的税率[物业税]回扣;基于市场的招标;以及自愿,永久性契约)。生产用地的所有者更有可能参加短期计划,这些计划提供的大规模财政激励措施适用于其财产的25%以下。非生产性土地所有者更有可能参加自愿性的长期计划,或提供适用于其财产> 75%的小额财政奖励措施。生产者和非生产者土地所有者的个人情况(收入,教育,健康)以及他们的规范差异(关于个人期望行为的信念)和态度上的显着差异可以解释这些结果。了解这些差异可能有助于制定更好地满足土地所有者需求的养护计划,从而增加对养护计划的参与和本地植被的保留。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号