...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain research >Conflict monitoring and resolution: are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials.
【24h】

Conflict monitoring and resolution: are two languages better than one? Evidence from reaction time and event-related brain potentials.

机译:冲突监控和解决:两种语言是否比一种更好?来自反应时间和与事件相关的脑电势的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An advantage for bilingual relative to monolingual young adults has been found for cognitive control tasks, although this finding is not consistent in the literature. The present investigation further examined this advantage using three tasks previously found to be sensitive to the effect. Furthermore, both behavioral and event-related brain potential (ERP) measures were included. Monolingual (n=25) and highly proficient bilingual (n=26) young adults completed a Stroop, Simon, and Eriksen flanker task while electrophysiological recording took place. Behaviorally there were no language group differences on any of the tasks. The ERP measures demonstrated differences between monolinguals and bilinguals with respect to conflict monitoring, resource allocation, stimulus categorization, and error-processing; however, these differences were not consistent across tasks. Given the similar behavioral performance across the groups the observed differences in brain responses may not represent an advantage for bilinguals. The results are discussed with respect to previous findings.
机译:相对于单语的年轻人,双语的优势在于认知控制任务,尽管这一发现在文献中并不一致。本研究使用先前发现对该效果敏感的三个任务进一步检查了这一优势。此外,还包括行为和事件相关的脑电势(ERP)措施。在进行电生理记录时,单语(n = 25)和高度熟练的双语(n = 26)年轻人完成了Stroop,Simon和Eriksen侧翼任务。在行为上,任何任务都没有语言组差异。 ERP措施表明,在冲突监测,资源分配,激励分类和错误处理方面,单语和双语之间存在差异。但是,这些差异在任务之间并不一致。考虑到各组的行为表现相似,观察到的大脑反应差异可能并不代表双语者的优势。关于先前的发现讨论了结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号