首页> 外文期刊>Conservation & society >Environmental Leaders and Indigenous Engagement in Australia: A Cosmopolitan Endeavour?
【24h】

Environmental Leaders and Indigenous Engagement in Australia: A Cosmopolitan Endeavour?

机译:澳大利亚的环境领袖和土著人参与:大都会的努力吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The World Heritage Convention protects sites of universal natural and cultural values, sometimes in combination. In 2015, it was amended to incorporate references to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP). International conventions are always in danger of becoming the hand-maidens of their signatory states. When evidence emerges that they have succumbed, it fuels criticism of cosmopolitanism. At the same time, environmental leaders sometimes clash with Indigenous people over efforts to conserve the natural values of traditional lands for the 'global good'. This article asks how international instruments with cosmopolitan ambitions influence the discourse and practice of national and subnational environmentalists attempting to find common ground with Indigenous groups. Drawing on interviews with 25 Australian environmental leaders, it finds the World Heritage Convention and UNDRIP have encouraged a pragmatic cosmopolitan practice among environmentalists, despite continuing intercultural differences in some quarters.
机译:《世界遗产公约》保护具有普遍自然和文化价值的遗址,有时甚至结合起来。 2015年,对《宪法》进行了修订,以纳入对《联合国土著人民权利宣言》(UNDRIP)的引用。国际公约总是有成为其签署国的首例的危险。当证据表明他们屈服了时,就会加剧对世界主义的批评。同时,环境领导人有时会与土著人民在保护传统土地的“全球利益”自然价值的努力方面发生冲突。本文询问具有国际主义野心的国际文书如何影响试图与土著团体找到共同点的国家和地方以下国家的环保主义者的话语和实践。根据对25位澳大利亚环境领导人的采访,它发现《世界遗产公约》和《联合国土著人民权利宣言》鼓励了环境保护主义者之间务实的国际化实践,尽管某些地区的跨文化差异仍然存在。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号