首页> 外文期刊>Brain research >Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.
【24h】

Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing.

机译:区分对注意力的空间和基于对象的影响:一项与事件相关的大脑潜能研究,包括外围提示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Do spatial attention and object attention modulate visual processing in similar ways? Previously we have found a dissociation between these two forms of attention on ERP measures of sensory processing under conditions of peripheral cueing, with spatial attention effects associated with changes over anterior scalp regions and object attention effects associated with changes over posterior regions (He, X., Fan, S., Zhou, K., Chen, L., 2004. Cue validity and object-based attention. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1085-1097). However, under conditions of central cueing recent data suggest that spatial and object attention have similar effects over posterior cortical areas (e.g., Martinez, A., Teder-Salejarvi, W., Hillyard, S.A., 2007. Spatial attention facilitates selection of illusory objects: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain Res. 1139, 143-152). In the present study we present further evidence for dissociation between spatial and object-based attention under conditions in which spatial attention effects were enhanced by increasing the cue validity and the task load. The data replicated our previous results, with the effects of spatial attention found in an enhanced anterior N1, while the effects of object-based attention emerged in an enhanced posterior N1. Analyses of attention effect maps and current source density maps confirmed the distinct scalp distributions. These results support the proposal that, under peripheral cueing, spatial attention and object attention are associated with activity respectively in anterior and posterior brain structures, and further suggest a distinction between how attention modulates processing under conditions of central cueing and peripheral cueing.
机译:空间注意力和物体注意力是否以类似方式调节视觉处理?以前,我们发现这两种形式的注意力在周围提示条件下对感觉处理的ERP措施之间没有关联,其空间注意力效应与前头皮区域的变化有关,而对象注意力效应与后部区域的变化有关(He,X. ,Fan,S.,Zhou,K.,Chen,L.,2004。提示有效性和基于对象的注意,J.Cogn.Neurosci.16,1085-1097)。但是,在集中提示的条件下,最近的数据表明,空间和物体注意在后皮质区域具有相似的效果(例如,Martinez,A.,Teder-Salejarvi,W.,Hillyard,SA,2007。空间注意有助于选择虚幻的对象:来自与事件相关的大脑潜能的证据(Brain Res。1139,143-152)。在本研究中,我们提供了进一步的证据,表明在通过增加提示有效性和任务负荷来增强空间注意力效果的条件下,空间注意力和基于对象的注意力之间的分离。数据重复了我们先前的结果,前注意力增强的N1中发现了空间注意力的影响,而后增强的N1中出现了基于对象的注意力的影响。注意效果图和当前源密度图的分析证实了明显的头皮分布。这些结果支持以下建议:在周围提示下,空间注意和对象注意分别与前脑和后脑结构中的活动相关,并且进一步提出了注意在中央提示和外围提示条件下如何调节处理的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号