首页> 外文期刊>エネルギ-·資源 >Life cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for elective vehicles
【24h】

Life cycle analysis of charging infrastructure for elective vehicles

机译:电动汽车充电基础设施的生命周期分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Life cycle analysis of a charging station for electric vehicle (EV) was performed on the three phases, that is, production, transportation and installation of the charging equipment which consists of charger, battery and stand. We chose parking lots on highways, commercial parking lots in cities, municipal facilities, shopping center etc. throughout the country as the charging sites according to the EV charge program in Southern California. Air pollutant emissions during the transportation phase were calculated based on the emission factors of vehicles, running speed and the transport distance between one factory of the charging equipment and each site. The share of transporting the charging machines in total emissions of CO{sub}2, SO{sub}x and CO was less than 15% and the production phase was dominant. In case of NO{sub}x, the share of transporting them was over 20%. The relation between gasoline vehicle and gas station was applied to estimate the number of EVs using the charging stations through the country, and the contribution of the charging stations to life cycle emissions of air pollutants in EM was presented. The share of infrastructure in total emissions of CO{sub}2 was 16% in our model case. Thus the development of the charging infrastructure almost did not change the advantage of EV compared to GV in terms of CO{sub}2, NO{sub}x, and CO emissions. But in case of SO{sub}x, EV emits it more than GV.
机译:电动汽车(EV)充电站的生命周期分析从三个阶段进行,即由充电器,电池和支架组成的充电设备的生产,运输和安装。根据南加州的电动汽车充电计划,我们选择了高速公路上的停车场,城市的商业停车场,市政设施,购物中心等作为充电地点。根据车辆的排放因子,行驶速度以及充电设备的一家工厂与每个站点之间的运输距离,计算运输阶段的空气污染物排放。运输充电机在CO {sub} 2,SO {sub} x和CO的总排放量中所占的比例不到15%,并且生产阶段占主导地位。如果是NO {sub} x,则运送它们的份额超过20%。利用加油站与加油站之间的关系来估计全国使用充电站的电动汽车的数量,并介绍了充电站对EM中空气污染物的生命周期排放的贡献。在我们的模型案例中,基础设施在CO {sub} 2的总排放中所占的比例为16%。因此,与GV相比,就CO {sub} 2,NO {sub} x和CO排放而言,充电基础设施的发展几乎没有改变EV的优势。但是在SO {sub} x的情况下,EV的排放量要大于GV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号