【24h】

C-reactive protein as a marker of infection in critically ill patients.

机译:C反应蛋白可作为重症患者感染的标志物。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A prospective, observational study was conducted in a medico-surgical intensive care unit to assess the value of C-reactive protein (CRP), temperature and white cell count (WCC) measurements for the diagnosis of infection in critically ill patients. CRP, temperature and WCC were monitored daily in 76 infected and 36 non-infected patients. Multiple receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were used to compare each parameter for infection diagnosis. The area under the curve (AUC) of CRP was significantly higher than that of temperature (0.93 and 0.75, respectively; p < 0.001). A CRP concentration of >8.7 mg/dL and a temperature of >38.2 degrees C were associated with infection, with a sensitivity of 93.4% and 54.8%, and a specificity of 86.1% and 88.9%, respectively. The ROC curve of WCC showed a poor diagnostic performance. The combination of CRP and temperature increased the specificity for infection diagnosis to 100%. In the subgroup of patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 48), CRP measurements were more reliable than temperature (AUC 0.92 and 0.78, respectively; p 0.006). The CRP levels in infected patients with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock were 15.2 +/- 8.2, 20.3 +/- 10.9 and 23.3 +/- 8.7 mg/dL, respectively (p 0.044). It was concluded that CRP was a better marker of infection than temperature. However, the combination of CRP and temperature measurements further increased the specificity for infection diagnosis, even in the subgroup of patients with VAP.
机译:在药物外科重症监护室进行了一项前瞻性观察研究,以评估C反应蛋白(CRP),体温和白细胞计数(WCC)的测量值,以诊断重症患者的感染。每天监测76例感染和36例未感染患者的CRP,温度和WCC。使用多个接收器工作特性(ROC)曲线比较感染诊断的每个参数。 CRP的曲线下面积(AUC)明显高于温度的面积(分别为0.93和0.75; p <0.001)。 CRP浓度> 8.7 mg / dL和温度> 38.2摄氏度与感染相关,敏感性分别为93.4%和54.8%,特异性分别为86.1%和88.9%。 WCC的ROC曲线显示出较差的诊断性能。 CRP和温度的组合将感染诊断的特异性提高到100%。在呼吸机相关性肺炎患者亚组(n = 48)中,CRP测量比温度更可靠(分别为AUC 0.92和0.78; p 0.006)。感染的脓毒症,严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的CRP水平分别为15.2 +/- 8.2、20.3 +/- 10.9和23.3 +/- 8.7 mg / dL(p 0.044)。结论是CRP是比温度更好的感染标志。但是,即使在VAP患者亚组中,CRP和温度测量值的结合也进一步提高了感染诊断的特异性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号