首页> 外文期刊>Community dental health >Oral health-related quality of life of elderly Germans -comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14
【24h】

Oral health-related quality of life of elderly Germans -comparison of GOHAI and OHIP-14

机译:与德国老人的口腔健康相关的生活质量-GOHAI和OHIP-14的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To obtain information about the subjective oral health status of non-clinical elderly populations of urban regions of Germany, one in the East and one in the West, by using OHIP-14 and, for first time, the GOHAI, and, furthermore, to compare the results obtained by use of both instruments. Basic research design: cross-sectional. Clinical setting: randomly chosen, non-clinical elderly population in urban regions of Germany. Participants: 197 participants (51% male) born in the years 1930-1932. Main outcome measures: GOHAI, OHIP-14. Results: Median GOHAI score was 54; median OHIP-14 score was 2. Scores indicative of severely impaired oral health were rare. The effect of living in eastern or western Germany was of minor significance. Although the internal consistency of both measures was comparable and the same positive association with psychological wellbeing, absence of dry mouth, burning mouth, and removable dentures (p<0.05) was observed, differences occurred. In simultaneous analysis of all items, factor analysis revealed only partial overlap of the items in extracted factors. Furthermore, the extreme score indicating no impairment was five times more frequent for OHIP-14. Of those who scored zero in OHIP-14, only 20% had the GOHAI equivalent score of 60, and for some GOHAI items the answer category for highest impairment was obtained. Conclusions: GOHAI scores for this randomly chosen non-clinical group enable comparison with scores for Germany measured in the future. The differences between GOHAI and OHIP-14 make it necessary to select the most appropriate instrument for a planned purpose and study population.
机译:目的:通过使用OHIP-14(首次使用GOHAI)以及此外,通过使用OHIP-14,获得有关德国城市地区(东部一个,西部一个)的非临床老年人口的主观口腔健康状况的信息,比较使用两种仪器获得的结果。基础研究设计:横断面。临床环境:德国城市地区随机选择的非临床老年人群。参与者:1930-1932年出生的197位参与者(男性占51%)。主要结果指标:GOHAI,OHIP-14。结果:GOHAI中位数为54; OHIP-14评分的中位数为2。很少有可表明严重损害口腔健康的评分。在德国东部或西部居住的影响意义不大。尽管两种方法的内部一致性是可比较的,并且与心理健康,口腔干燥,口腔灼热和可移动义齿的缺失之间呈正相关(p <0.05),但仍存在差异。在同时分析所有项目时,因素分析显示提取的因素中项目仅部分重叠。此外,表明没有损害的极端评分是OHIP-14的五倍。在OHIP-14中得分为零的人中,只有20%的人的GOHAI等效分数为60,并且对于某些GOHAI项,获得了最高损伤的答案类别。结论:该随机选择的非临床组的GOHAI得分可与将来测得的德国得分进行比较。 GOHAI和OHIP-14之间的差异使得有必要为计划的目的和研究人群选择最合适的仪器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号