...
首页> 外文期刊>Complementary therapies in clinical practice >The therapeutic effect of collateral meridian therapy is comparable to acupoint pressure therapy in treating myofascial pain syndrome
【24h】

The therapeutic effect of collateral meridian therapy is comparable to acupoint pressure therapy in treating myofascial pain syndrome

机译:经络络络治疗在肌筋膜疼痛综合征中的疗效可与穴位压力疗法相媲美

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: This study compared the therapeutic effects of collateral meridian therapy (CMT) with traditional acupoint pressure therapy (APT) in patients with unilateral upper back pain. Material and methods: Forty-nine patients with active myofascial trigger points in upper trapezius muscle were randomly allocated to the control (CTL), APT, or CMT group. Each subject in the CMT and APT groups received 2 sessions of treatment per week over 1 month. Results: Patients in the APT and CMT groups showed significant improvements 1 month after treatment in visual analogue scale, range of motion, pain pressure threshold, regional superficial blood flow, and physical health, as compared to the CTL group. No significant differences in outcome measures were found between APT and CMT groups 1 month after treatment. Conclusion: Both APT and CMT have comparable therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of unilateral upper back pain with active myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle. Shan-Chi Ko to treat various kinds of pain, including myofascial pain.
机译:目的:本研究比较了经络经络疗法(CMT)与传统穴位疗法(APT)在单侧上背部疼痛患者中的治疗效果。材料和方法:将49例活动性肌筋膜触发点位于上斜方肌的患者随机分配至对照组(CTL),APT或CMT组。 CMT和APT组的每个受试者在1个月内每周接受2次治疗。结果:与CTL组相比,治疗后1个月,APT和CMT组的患者在视觉模拟评分,运动范围,疼痛压力阈值,局部浅表血流和身体健康方面均表现出显着改善。治疗后1个月,APT组和CMT组之间的结局指标无显着差异。结论:APT和CMT在单侧上背部疼痛和活动性肌筋膜触发点在上斜方肌中的治疗效果相当。杉杉智治各种疼痛,包括肌筋膜疼痛。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号