首页> 外文期刊>Community dental health >Are Stage of Change constructs relevant for subjective oral health in a vulnerable population?
【24h】

Are Stage of Change constructs relevant for subjective oral health in a vulnerable population?

机译:变更阶段构建与弱势人群的主观口腔健康是否相关?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Stage of Change constructs may be proxy markers of psychosocial health which, in turn, are related to oral health. Objective: To determine if Stage of Change constructs were associated with subjective oral health in a population at heightened risk of dental disease. Methods: Stage of Change constructs were developed from a validated 18-item scale and categorised into 'Pre-contemplative', 'Contemplative' and 'Active'. A convenience sample of 446 Australian non-Aboriginal women pregnant by an Aboriginal male (age range 14-43 years) provided data to evaluate the outcome variables (self-rated oral health and oral health impairment), the Stage of Change constructs and socio-demographic, behavioural and access-related factors. Factors significant at the p<0.05 level in bivariate analysis were entered into prevalence regression models. Results: Approximately 54% of participants had fair/poor self-rated oral health and 34% had oral health impairment. Around 12% were 'Pre-contemplative', 46% ` Contemplative' and 42% 'Active'. Being either 'pre-contemplative' or 'contemplative' was associated with poor self-rated oral health after adjusting for socio-demographic factors. 'Pre-contemplative' ceased being significant after adjusting for dentate status and dental behaviour. 'Pre-contemplative' remained significant when adjusting for dental cost, but not ` Contemplative'. The Stages of Change constructs ceased being associated with self-rated oral health after adjusting for all confounders. Only ` Contemplative' (reference: 'Active') was a risk indicator in the null model for oral health impairment which persisted after adding dentate status, dental behaviour and dental cost variables, but not socio-demographics. When adjusting for all confounders, ` Contemplative' was not a risk indicator for oral health impairment. Conclusions: Both the 'Pre-contemplative' and 'Contemplative' Stage of Change constructs were associated with poor self-rated oral health and oral health impairment after adjusting for some, but not all, covariates. When considered as a proxy marker of psychosocial health, Stage of Change constructs may have some relevance for subjective oral health.
机译:变更阶段构建可能是心理社会健康的代用标记,而心理社会健康又与口腔健康有关。目的:确定“变化阶段”结构是否与牙齿疾病风险高的人群的主观口腔健康有关。方法:从经过验证的18个项目量表中开发变更阶段构造,并将其分类为“先沉思”,“沉思”和“积极”。便利样本包括446名澳大利亚原住民男性(年龄范围为14-43岁)的澳大利亚非原住民妇女,这些数据提供了评估结局变量(自我评估的口腔健康和口腔健康障碍),变化阶段结构和社会性别的数据。人口,行为和访问相关因素。将双变量分析中p <0.05的显着因素输入流行率回归模型。结果:大约54%的参与者口腔健康状况良好/不良,而34%的口腔健康受损。大约12%的人是“沉思型”,46%的“沉思型”和42%的“活跃型”。在调整了社会人口统计学因素后,“沉思”或“沉思”与自我评估的口腔健康状况差有关。在调整了牙齿状况和牙齿行为之后,“沉思”不再重要。在调整牙科成本时,“先考虑”仍然很重要,但“先考虑”则不重要。在调整了所有混杂因素后,“变化阶段”结构不再与自我评估的口腔健康相关。在口腔健康受损的无效模型中,只有“沉思”(参考:“活跃”)是风险指标,该模型在添加了牙齿状态,牙科行为和牙科费用变量之后仍然存在,但没有社会人口统计学数据。在调整所有混杂因素时,“沉思”并不是口腔健康受损的风险指标。结论:在对一些(但不是全部)协变量进行校正后,“改变前”和“思考”阶段的构造都与不良的自我评估口腔健康和口腔健康受损有关。当被认为是心理社会健康的代用标记时,“变化阶段”结构可能与主观口腔健康有些相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号