首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental dermatology >Imiquimod 5% cream versus timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution for treating superficial proliferating infantile haemangiomas: A retrospective study
【24h】

Imiquimod 5% cream versus timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution for treating superficial proliferating infantile haemangiomas: A retrospective study

机译:咪喹莫特5%乳膏对比噻吗洛尔0.5%滴眼液治疗浅表性增殖性婴儿血管瘤的回顾性研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background Infantile haemangiomas (IHs) are the most common vascular tumours of infancy. Topical therapies are a possible treatment for superficial IHs. Aim To determine the efficacy and safety of topical therapy in the treatment of superficial proliferating IHs. Methods The medical records of all the patients with proliferating superficial IHs were reviewed. All lesions had been treated either with imiquimod 5% cream or timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution. Lesions were classified into pairs, with one of each treatment in each pair, matched by anatomical location, colour and size. A visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Haemangioma Activity Score (HAS) were used to evaluate the efficacy of the two drugs. The paired Student t-test was used to test for differences in recovery with these two treatments. Results In total, 51 patients treated with timolol and 94 treated with imiquimod met the inclusion criteria, and 20 lesions treated with timolol were successfully matched to a lesion treated with imiquimod. The paired t-test indicated that there was no significant difference in either VAS score (P = 0.11) or HAS (P = 0.49). For the imiquimod-treated patients, crusting was the most common reaction (65.0%, 13/20). This did not cause any superficial scarring or skin pigmentation in the matched pairs; however, superficial scars (14.9%, 14/94) and skin pigmentation disorders (28.7%, 27/94) were reported for some of the unmatched cases. There were no adverse events (AEs) during the treatment with timolol. Conclusions Both imiquimod 5% cream or timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution showed equivalent clinical efficacy after 4 months of treatment. Timolol appeared to have fewer AEs than imiquimod in the management of superficial IHs. Larger, prospective controlled trials with long-term treatment are needed to confirm these results.
机译:背景婴儿血管瘤(IHs)是婴儿中最常见的血管肿瘤。局部治疗是浅表IH的可能治疗方法。目的确定局部治疗在浅表增生性IHs治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法对所有浅表性IH增生患者的病历进行回顾。所有病变均已用5%咪喹莫特乳膏或0.5%噻吗洛尔眼药水治疗。将病变分为几对,每对中的每一种治疗均与解剖位置,颜色和大小相匹配。视觉模拟量表(VAS)和血血管瘤活性评分(HAS)用于评估两种药物的疗效。配对的Student t检验用于测试这两种治疗方法的恢复差异。结果总共有51例接受噻吗洛尔治疗的患者和94例接受咪喹莫特治疗的患者符合纳入标准,并且成功地将20例接受噻吗洛尔治疗的病变与接受咪喹莫特治疗的病变相匹配。配对t检验表明,VAS评分(P = 0.11)或HAS(P = 0.49)均无显着差异。对于接受咪喹莫特治疗的患者,结s是最常见的反应(65.0%,13/20)。这不会在配对中引起任何表面疤痕或皮肤色素沉着。然而,据报道,在一些不匹配的病例中,浅表疤痕(14.9%,14/94)和皮肤色素沉着症(28.7%,27/94)。噻吗洛尔治疗期间无不良事件(AEs)。结论5%的imiquimod乳膏或0.5%的timolol眼药水在治疗4个月后均具有相同的临床疗效。在表面IH的管理中,Timollol的不良事件似乎比咪喹莫特少。需要采用长期治疗的大型前瞻性对照试验来证实这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号