...
首页> 外文期刊>Computational Materials Science >Kinetic Activation-Relaxation Technique and Self-Evolving Atomistic Kinetic Monte Carlo: Comparison of on-the-fly Kinetic Monte Carlo algorithms
【24h】

Kinetic Activation-Relaxation Technique and Self-Evolving Atomistic Kinetic Monte Carlo: Comparison of on-the-fly Kinetic Monte Carlo algorithms

机译:动力学活化松弛技术和自演化原子动力学蒙特卡洛:动态动力学蒙特卡洛算法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We present a comparison of the Kinetic Activation-Relaxation Technique (k-ART) and the Self-Evolving Atomistic Kinetic Monte Carlo (SEAKMC), two off-lattice, on-the-fly Kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) techniques that were recently used to solve several materials science problems. We show that if the initial displacements are localized the dimer method and the Activation-Relaxation Technique nouveau provide similar performance. We also show that k-ART and SEAKMC, although based on different approximations, are in agreement with each other, as demonstrated by the examples of 50 vacancies in a 1950-atom Fe box and of interstitial loops in 16,000-atom boxes. Generally speaking, k-ART's treatment of geometry and flickers is more flexible, e.g. it can handle amorphous systems, and rigorous than SEAKMC's, while the later's concept of active volumes permits a significant speedup of simulations for the systems under consideration and therefore allows investigations of processes requiring large systems that are not accessible if not localizing calculations. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们介绍了动力学活化松弛技术(k-ART)和自演化原子动力学蒙特卡洛(SEAKMC)的比较,这两种是最近使用的非晶格动态的动力学蒙特卡洛(KMC)技术解决一些材料科学问题。我们表明,如果初始位移是局部的,则二聚体方法和“活化松弛技术”将提供相似的性能。我们还表明,k-ART和SEAKMC尽管基于不同的近似值,但彼此一致,如1950原子Fe盒中的50个空位和16,000原子原子盒中的间隙环的示例所示。一般来说,k-ART的几何形状和闪烁处理更加灵活,例如它可以处理非晶体系统,并且比SEAKMC的系统严格,而后来的活动量概念可以大大加快所考虑系统的仿真速度,因此可以研究需要大型系统的过程,如果不进行本地化计算则无法访问。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号