【24h】

Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying aphasic and non-aphasic speakers.

机译:机器学习方法对无语和无语说话者分类的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The performance of eight machine learning classifiers were compared with three aphasia related classification problems. The first problem contained naming data of aphasic and non-aphasic speakers tested with the Philadelphia Naming Test. The second problem included the naming data of Alzheimer and vascular disease patients tested with Finnish version of the Boston Naming Test. The third problem included aphasia test data of patients suffering from four different aphasic syndromes tested with the Aachen Aphasia Test. The first two data sets were small. Therefore, the data used in the tests were artificially generated from the original confrontation naming data of 23 and 22 subjects, respectively. The third set contained aphasia test data of 146 aphasic speakers and was used as such in the experiments. With the first and the third data set the classifiers could successfully be used for the task, while the results with the second data set were less encouraging. However, based on the results, no single classifier performed exceptionally well with all data sets, suggesting that the selection of the classifier used for classification of aphasic data should be based on the experiments performed with the data set at hand.
机译:将八个机器学习分类器的性能与三个失语相关的分类问题进行了比较。第一个问题包含使用费城命名测试测试的无语和无语说话者的命名数据。第二个问题包括阿尔茨海默氏症的命名数据和芬兰版本的波士顿命名测试对血管疾病患者的命名。第三个问题包括患有亚琛失语症测试的四种失语症患者的失语症测试数据。前两个数据集很小。因此,测试中使用的数据分别来自23位和22位受试者的原始对抗命名数据。第三组包含146个失语者的失语测试数据,并在实验中就这样使用。使用第一个和第三个数据集,分类器可以成功地用于任务,而使用第二个数据集的结果则不那么令人鼓舞。但是,基于结果,没有一个分类器在所有数据集上都能表现出色,这表明用于无相数据分类的分类器的选择应基于手头数据集的实验。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号