...
【24h】

Supporting the classification of pathology reports: comparing two information retrieval methods.

机译:支持病理报告的分类:比较两种信息检索方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this contribution two methods from the domain of information retrieval are compared. The goal of the retrieval is to select from a library of pathology reports those ones that are most similar to a given report. The SNOMED codes that accompany these reports are presented to the pathologist who has to code the given report with the aim to improve the quality of coding. The reports were represented either as a vector of words or as a vector of N-grams. Both 4-, 5- and 6-grams were used. The similarity of the reports was determined by comparing the SNOMED terms that were added to the reports. It could be concluded that the word-based method was consistently better than the N-gram method.
机译:在这一贡献中,比较了信息检索领域的两种方法。检索的目的是从病理报告库中选择与给定报告最相似的报告。这些报告随附的SNOMED代码将提供给病理学家,病理学家必须对给定的报告进行编码,以提高编码质量。报告以单词的向量或N-gram的向量表示。使用了4克,5克和6克。通过比较添加到报告中的SNOMED术语来确定报告的相似性。可以得出结论,基于单词的方法始终优于N-gram方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号