...
首页> 外文期刊>Computers and Electronics in Agriculture >Image analysis method to evaluate beak and head motion of broiler chickens during feeding
【24h】

Image analysis method to evaluate beak and head motion of broiler chickens during feeding

机译:评估肉鸡饲养过程中喙和头部运动的图像分析方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

While feeding broiler chickens may exhibit different biomechanical movements in relation to the physical properties of feed such as size, shape and hardness. Furthermore, the chicken's anatomical features at various ages, genders and breeds in conjunction with feed type and feeder design parameters may also have an influence on biomechanical movement. To determine the significance of these parameters during feeding, kinematic measurements related to the biomechanical motions are required. However, determining this information manually from video by a human operator is tedious and prone to errors. The aim of this study was to develop a machine vision technique which visually identifies the relevant biomechanical variables attributed to broiler feeding behaviour from high-speed video footages. A total of 369 frames from three broiler chicks of 5 days old were manually measured and compared to the automatic measurement. For each bird six mandibulations (i.e. a cycle of opening and closing the beak) were manually selected, which were two different sequences of three consecutive mandibulations starting right after a feed grasping. The kinematics variables considered were: (i) head displacement (eye centre position; x- and y-axis); (ii) beak opening speed (given in mm ms(-1)); (iii) beak closing speed (measured in mm ms(-1)); (iv) beak opening acceleration (given in mm ms(-2)); and (v) beak closing acceleration (given in mm ms(-2)). Results indicated that the highest error for eye position detection was 1.05 mm for x-axis and 0.67 for the y-axis. The difference between manual and automatic (algorithm output) measurements for the beak gape was 0.22 +/- 0.009 mm, in which the maximum difference was 0.76 mm. Regression analysis indicated that both measures are highly correlated (R-2 = 99.2%). Statistical tests suggested that the primary probably causes of error are the speed and acceleration of the beak motion (i.e. blurred image), as well as the presence of feed particles in the first and second mandibulations right after the feed grasping (i.e. occluded beak tips by feed particles). The presented method calculated automatically the position of the eye centre (x- and y-axis) and both upper and lower beak tips distance in a high level of accuracy, but the model can be improved by using a camera with higher resolution, a higher acquisition rate, and infrared-reflective markers. The method has the potential to facilitate efficient and repeatable acquisition of biomechanical data of broiler chickens during feeding, and be used to benchmark the feed physical properties and its processing methods, likewise evolving knowledge for futures studies in feeders' design. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:在喂养肉鸡时,相对于饲料的物理特性(例如大小,形状和硬度),鸡可能表现出不同的生物力学运动。此外,不同年龄,性别和品种的鸡的解剖学特征以及饲料类型和饲养器设计参数也可能对生物力学运动产生影响。为了确定喂食期间这些参数的重要性,需要进行与生物力学运动有关的运动学测量。然而,由人工操作员从视频手动确定该信息是乏味的并且容易出错。这项研究的目的是开发一种机器视觉技术,该技术可以从高速录像中直观地识别出归因于肉鸡饲养行为的相关生物力学变量。手动测量了三只5天大的雏鸡的369帧,并与自动测量进行了比较。对于每只鸟,手动选择了六个摆动(即打开和关闭喙的周期),这是在抓取饲料后立即开始的三个连续摆动的两个不同序列。所考虑的运动学变量为:(i)头部位移(眼睛中心位置; x和y轴); (ii)喙的打开速度(以mm ms(-1)为单位); (iii)喙的闭合速度(以毫米毫秒(-1)为单位); (iv)喙的打开加速度(单位为毫米ms(-2)); (v)喙的闭合加速度(以mm ms(-2)为单位)。结果表明,眼睛位置检测的最高误差为x轴为1.05 mm,y轴为0.67。喙间隙的手动和自动(算法输出)测量之间的差异为0.22 +/- 0.009 mm,其中最大差异为0.76 mm。回归分析表明,这两个指标高度相关(R-2 = 99.2%)。统计测试表明,错误的主要原因可能是喙运动的速度和加速度(即图像模糊),以及在抓紧饲料后第一和第二次旋转中存在饲料颗粒(即,喙尖被堵塞)。饲料颗粒)。提出的方法可以自动准确地计算出眼中心的位置(x和y轴)以及上下喙尖的距离,但是可以使用分辨率更高,分辨率更高的相机来改进模型。采集率和红外反射标记。该方法具有促进饲喂期间肉鸡生物力学数据的有效和可重复获取的潜力,并可以用来对饲料的物理性质及其加工方法进行基准测试,同样也可以为饲喂器设计中的未来研究提供不断发展的知识。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号