首页> 外文期刊>Computational statistics & data analysis >Bayesian and likelihood methods for fitting multilevel models with complex level-1 variation
【24h】

Bayesian and likelihood methods for fitting multilevel models with complex level-1 variation

机译:用贝叶斯和似然方法拟合具有复杂1级变异的多级模型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In multilevel modelling it is common practice to assume constant variance at level 1 across individuals. In this paper we consider situations where the level-1 variance depends on predictor variables. We examine two cases using a dataset from educational research; in the first case the variance at level 1 of a test score depends on a continuous "intake score" predictor, and in the second case the variance is assumed to differ according to gender. We contrast two maximum-likelihood methods based on iterative generalised least squares with two Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods based on adaptive hybrid versions of the Metropolis-Hastings (MH) algorithm, and we use two simulation experiments to compare these four methods. We find that all four approaches have good repeated-sampling behaviour in the classes of models we simulate. We conclude by contrasting raw- and log-scale formulations of the level-1 variance function, and we find that adaptive MH sampling is considerably more efficient than adaptive rejection sampling when the heteroscedasticity is modelled polynomially on the log scale.
机译:在多级建模中,通常的做法是假设各个人在第1级处于恒定方差。在本文中,我们考虑了1级方差取决于预测变量的情况。我们使用来自教育研究的数据集检查了两个案例;在第一种情况下,测验分数在1级的差异取决于连续的“入学分数”预测因子,在第二种情况下,假设差异随性别而变化。我们将两种基于迭代广义最小二乘的最大似然方法与两种基于Metropolis-Hastings(MH)算法的自适应混合版本的马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法进行对比,并使用两个仿真实验来比较这四种方法。我们发现,在我们模拟的模型类别中,所有四种方法都具有良好的重复采样行为。我们通过对比1级方差函数的原始和对数尺度公式来得出结论,并且发现,当异方差在对数尺度上进行多项式建模时,自适应MH采样比自适应拒绝采样有效得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号