首页> 外文期刊>Community practitioner: the journal of the Community Practitioners’ & Health Visitors’ Association >Controversial questions (part two): should there be a direct-entry route to health visitor education?
【24h】

Controversial questions (part two): should there be a direct-entry route to health visitor education?

机译:有争议的问题(第二部分):是否应该有直接进入健康访问者教育的途径?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is the second paper in a series of three, drawing on the experience of providing evidence to the Health Select Committee's 2008 inquiry into health inequalities. Material submitted has been adapted and expanded according to three common and often controversial questions. One member of the committee enquired about the relevance of education and training to recruitment issues in health visiting, asking why it is necessary to be a nurse and what would be the barriers to changing this arrangement, which has been in force since the 1960s.This paper summarises some of the longstanding discussions about this issue, which has rarely been off the agenda, and proposes that, since health visiting is no longer in statute, the time has come to take a radical approach and to change current arrangements.
机译:这是三篇系列文章中的第二篇,借鉴了为健康选择委员会2008年有关健康不平等问题的调查提供证据的经验。根据三个常见且经常引起争议的问题,对提交的材料进行了修改和扩展。该委员会的一名成员询问了卫生保健访问中教育和培训与招聘问题的相关性,询问为什么要当一名护士以及改变这一安排的障碍是什么(自1960年代以来一直如此)。该论文总结了有关该问题的长期讨论,这些讨论很少被提上议事日程,并提出,由于健康检查已不再是法规,因此现在应该采取一种根本的方法并改变当前的安排。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号