...
首页> 外文期刊>Community mental health journal >Implementation of an Evidence Based Guideline for Assessment and Documentation of the Civil Commitment Process
【24h】

Implementation of an Evidence Based Guideline for Assessment and Documentation of the Civil Commitment Process

机译:实施基于证据的公民承诺流程评估和文件编制指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement an evidence-based practice guideline for assessment and documentation of the civil commitment process. Participants included six civil commitment examiners who conduct court ordered psychiatric evaluations at two crisis intervention centers in rural area of southeaster state. Data collection was conducted utilizing a chart audit tool both pre and post intervention of 100 civil commitment evaluations. The intervention included the development of an evidenced based form for documentation of civil commitment evaluations and a one on one educational training session was conducted for each participant. Descriptive statistics (t test) was utilized to analyze the data collected. The project demonstrated a significant increase as 25.5 % of evaluations contained the America Psychiatric Association's recommended 11 domains of assessment prior to implementation compared to 65.6 % (p value = 0.018) post implementation. Moreover, participants with family practice training showed an increase in commitment rates from 60 to 77.3 % (p value = 0.066). Whereas, psychiatric trained participants showed a decrease from 83.75 to 77.66 % (p value = 0.38). Demonstrating that court ordered evaluations guided by a standardized form based on evidence affected examiners recommendations for commitments.
机译:此质量改进项目的目的是实施基于证据的实践准则,以评估和记录民事承诺流程。参加者包括六名民事承诺审查员,他们在东南部州州东部的两个危机干预中心进行了法院下令的精神病学评估。数据收集是通过图表审计工具在进行100次民事承诺评估之前和之后进行的。干预措施包括开发一个以证据为基础的表格,用于记录公民承诺评估,并为每个参与者进行了一对一的教育培训。描述性统计(t检验)用于分析收集的数据。该项目证明了显着的增加,因为实施前有25.5%的评估包含了美国精神病学协会推荐的11个评估领域,而实施后为65.6%(p值= 0.018)。此外,接受家庭实践培训的参与者的承诺率从60%提高到77.3%(p值= 0.066)。而接受过精神科培训的参与者从83.75%下降到77.66%(p值= 0.38)。证明法院下令基于证据的标准表格指导评估,影响了审查员的承诺建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号