首页> 外文期刊>Bioresource Technology: Biomass, Bioenergy, Biowastes, Conversion Technologies, Biotransformations, Production Technologies >Life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) in comparison to different energy recovery, animal-based and non-refining management systems
【24h】

Life cycle assessment of the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) in comparison to different energy recovery, animal-based and non-refining management systems

机译:与不同的能量回收,基于动物的和非炼制的管理系统相比,从生物质(IFBB)中综合产生固体燃料和沼气的生命周期评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The study compares energy production from semi-natural grasslands by the integrated generation of solid fuel and biogas from biomass (IFBB) through mechanical separation of the biomass with the dry fermentation (DF) and hay combustion system (HC). In addition, traditional use for beef cattle production and non-refining systems of landscape conservation, i.e. mulching and composting, are considered. Highest conversion efficiency (45-54% of the gross yield), net savings of fossil fuels (44-54GJha ~(-1)) and net savings of greenhouse gases (2.9-3.7tCO _(2-eq)ha ~(-1)) are obtained by HC and IFBB. Potentials of DF are limited due to low digestibility of the mature biomass.
机译:这项研究比较了半自然草原的能源生产,该能源是通过利用干式发酵(DF)和干草燃烧系统(HC)对生物质进行机械分离,从生物质(IFBB)中综合产生固体燃料和沼气。另外,考虑了肉牛生产的传统用途和景观保护的非精制系统,即覆盖和堆肥。最高的转化效率(占总产量的45-54%),化石燃料的净节约量(44-54GJha〜(-1))和温室气体的净节约量(2.9-3.7tCO _(2-eq)ha〜(- 1))是由HC和IFBB获得的。由于成熟生物质的低消化率,DF的潜力受到限制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号