首页> 外文期刊>Biopreservation and biobanking >Managing the Introduction of Biobanks to Potential Participants: Lessons from a Deliberative Public Forum
【24h】

Managing the Introduction of Biobanks to Potential Participants: Lessons from a Deliberative Public Forum

机译:管理对潜在参与者的生物银行介绍:协商性公共论坛的经验教训

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Ongoing debate exists around how best to manage the issue of informed consent for research involving human tissue biobanks.However,the issue is well recognized and covered in the academic literature.A related and arguably equally important issue that to date has not received much attention is how best to manage the process of identifying and initially contacting individuals for their participation in a biobank. While many populationbased biobanks strive for random sampling of healthy participants from the general population,disease-based biobanks usually need to rely on some sort of referral process to achieve specificity for type and subcategories of disease.There are thus numerous ethical implications regarding the way in which this referral process is managed.In this article we begin by providing a brief outline of the nature of the problems associated with the initial introduction between a biobank and potential research participants.We then consider data from a recent public deliberation on the topic of human tissue biobanking.In these discussions, participants were posed questions regarding their views pertaining to the introduction of potential donors to biobanks, and asked to make recommendations to be considered by policy makers in British Columbia,Canada.Based on these data we conclude that there is general agreement that introduction of research biobanks to potential donors should be conducted face to face, and by a medical professional known to the donor,and depending on donor circumstances,is acceptable during either pre- or postoperative periods.The strong preference for the introduction to involve a family physician should be considered in the future design of biobank contact and consent processes.
机译:关于如何最好地处理涉及人体组织生物库的研究的知情同意问题,目前正在进行辩论。然而,该问题已为学术文献所充分认识和涵盖。迄今为止,尚未引起人们广泛关注的一个相关且同样重要的问题是如何最好地管理识别和最初联系个人以参与生物银行的过程。虽然许多基于人口的生物库都在努力从普通人群中随机抽取健康参与者,但基于疾病的生物库通常需要依靠某种转诊过程来实现对疾病类型和亚类的特异性,因此,关于这种疾病的治疗方法存在许多伦理学意义。在本文中,我们首先简要介绍了与生物库和潜在研究参与者之间的最初介绍有关的问题的性质,然后我们考虑了有关人类主题的最新公开讨论的数据组织生物库。在这些讨论中,与会人员对与将潜在捐助者引入生物库有关的观点提出了疑问,并要求提出建议,供加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的决策者考虑。基于这些数据,我们得出结论:普遍同意应将研究生物库引入潜在捐助者在术前或术后,可以接受捐赠者所熟悉的专业医生进行面对面的手术,这取决于捐赠者的情况。在未来的设计中,应考虑强烈建议引入家庭医生生物库联系和同意流程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号