首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental ophthalmology >Antivascular endothelial growth factors in the treatment of macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis
【24h】

Antivascular endothelial growth factors in the treatment of macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion: A meta-analysis

机译:抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视网膜中央静脉阻塞继发性黄斑水肿的荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion is a major cause of vision loss. Intraocuclar anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injection is a promising treatment but lacks clinical evidence of its safety and efficacy. Design: Meta-analysis. Participants: Patients from previously reported randomized, controlled trials comparing intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor versus sham injections. Methods: A comprehensive search in MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE was conducted for reports published by April 2013. A meta-analysis of the retrieved data was conducted in RevMan 5.2 software. Main Outcome Measures: Primary outcome measures were changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were the proportion of eyes changing 15 or more letters on the Early Treatment in Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart, the proportion with neovascularization and changes in the 25-item Visual Function Questionnaire. Severe adverse events were summarized to assess safety. Results: Six trials involving a total of 940 eyes were included in the meta-analysis. The mean difference in 6-month changes in best-corrected visual acuity and central retinal thickness for the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor group were 15.2 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (P<0.00001) and -242.2μm (P<0.00001), respectively. Severe adverse event incidence was similar between the groups. Conclusions: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections were safe and effective for macular oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion. The efficacy was rapid and robust. Further trials are needed to determine the detailed indicatio.
机译:背景:继发于视网膜中央静脉阻塞的黄斑水肿是导致视力丧失的主要原因。腔内抗血管内皮生长因子注射剂是一种有前途的治疗方法,但缺乏其安全性和有效性的临床证据。设计:荟萃分析。研究对象:先前报道的随机对照试验,比较玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子与假注射。方法:对MEDLINE,CENTRAL和EMBASE进行了全面搜索,以查找2013年4月发布的报告。在RevMan 5.2软件中对检索到的数据进行荟萃分析。主要结果指标:主要结果指标是最佳矫正视力和基线中央视网膜厚度的变化。次要结果指标是在糖尿病视网膜病变的早期治疗研究图表上,眼睛改变15个或更多字母的比例,新血管形成的比例和25个项目的视觉功能问卷的变化。总结了严重不良事件以评估安全性。结果:荟萃分析包括六项试验,共940只眼。抗血管内皮生长因子组的最佳矫正视力和视网膜中央厚度在6个月变化中的平均差异为15.2早期糖尿病视网膜病变研究信(P <0.00001)和-242.2μm(P <0.00001),分别。两组之间的严重不良事件发生率相似。结论:玻璃体腔内抗血管内皮生长因子注射液治疗继发于视网膜中央静脉阻塞的黄斑水肿是安全有效的。疗效迅速而稳定。需要进一步试验以确定详细的指示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号