...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental ophthalmology >Comparison of clinical optic disc assessment with tests of early visual field loss.
【24h】

Comparison of clinical optic disc assessment with tests of early visual field loss.

机译:临床视盘评估与早期视野丧失测试的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose: Clinical optic disc assessment may identify glaucomatous optic neuropathy prior to a patient developing visual field abnormalities on achromatic automated peri-metry (AAP). Tests targeting axons that are selectively damaged or whose redundancy is low, such as short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) and frequency doubling perimetry (FDP), may detect visual field loss before it is seen on AAP. This study investigated whether patients in whom characteristic glaucomatous optic disc damage was present without AAP abnormalities had visual field abnormalities with SWAP and FDP. Methods: A sample of patients (n = 50) with ocular hypertension (normal AAP) were selected, who had SWAP, FDP and stereofundus photography performed. The photographs were then analysed by two glaucoma subspecialists who were masked to the assessments of the other and to the patients' SWAP and FDP results. A categorization of the optic discs was made as either normal or abnormal and this was compared with their SWAP and FDP findings. Results: On comparing SWAP and FDP with clinical optic disc assessment as the 'gold standard', the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were 33%, 92%, 57% and 81%, respectively, for SWAP and 25%, 89%, 49% and 79%, respectively, for FDP. Conclusion: In glaucoma suspects, the study suggests that SWAP and FDP identify subjects with early glaucomatous optic neuropathy missed by AAP.
机译:目的:临床视盘评估可在患者在消色差自动视野检查(AAP)上出现视野异常之前识别青光眼性视神经病变。针对选择性受损或冗余度低的轴突的测试,例如短波自动视野(SWAP)和倍频视野(FDP),可能会在AAP上发现视野损失之前就检测出来。这项研究调查了存在特征性青光眼视盘损伤但无AAP异常的患者是否患有SWAP和FDP视野异常。方法:选择50名患有高眼压(AAP正常)的患者,他们接受了SWAP,FDP和立体眼照相。然后由两名青光眼专科医师对照片进行分析,他们对另一方的评估以及患者的SWAP和FDP结果进行了掩盖。将视盘分类为正常或异常,并将其与SWAP和FDP结果进行比较。结果:将SWAP和FDP与临床视盘评估作为“金标准”进行比较时,敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为33%,92%,57%和81%, SWAP和FDP分别为25%,89%,49%和79%。结论:在青光眼可疑者中,该研究表明,SWAP和FDP可识别出AAP遗漏的早期青光眼性视神经病变的受试者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号