...
首页> 外文期刊>Clinical and experimental ophthalmology >Comparison of optic nerve head parameters using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography
【24h】

Comparison of optic nerve head parameters using Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography

机译:使用海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3和光谱域光学相干断层扫描技术比较视神经头部参数

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: To assess the agreement between the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph and Cirrus spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus HD-OCT [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA]) when measuring optic disc parameters. Design: Prospective, cross-sectional study. Participants: A total of 96 glaucoma patients and 21 normal subjects were analysed. Methods: Optic nerve head measurements, including disc area, rim area, cup-to-disc ratio and cup volume were obtained using both the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 (Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany). Main Outcome Measurements: Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between each of the optic disc parameters. Results: Although Cirrus HD-OCT values were smaller than Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 values for the disc and rim areas, overall the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 measurements were highly correlated (r=0.657 to 0.821). As compared with Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3, disc and rim areas tended to be minimized by Cirrus HD-OCT, especially when there were large disc and rim areas, although there was no relationship between the discrepancy and the level of measurement of the cup-to-disc ratio. The optical coherence tomography overestimated the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph-determined cup volume, especially when there were large cup volumes. Conclusions: Bland-Altman analyses revealed that with the exception of the cup-to-disc ratio, there was poor agreement between the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3 morphometric measurements. In addition, with the exception of the cup-to-disc ratio, the optic nerve head measurements could not be directly compared between the Cirrus HD-OCT and Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3.
机译:背景:为了评估海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪和Cirrus光谱域光学相干断层扫描技术(Cirrus HD-OCT [Carl Zeiss Meditec,都柏林,美国,美国])之间的一致性。设计:前瞻性,横断面研究。参与者:总共分析了96名青光眼患者和21名正常受试者。方法:使用Cirrus HD-OCT和Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3(Heidelberg Engineering GmbH,Heidelberg,德国)获得视神经头的测量值,包括椎间盘面积,边缘面积,杯碟比和杯体积。主要结果测量:使用Bland-Altman图来评估每个视盘参数之间的一致性。结果:尽管圆盘和边缘区域的Cirrus HD-OCT值小于Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3的值,但总体而言,Cirrus HD-OCT和Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3的测量值高度相关(r = 0.657至0.821)。与Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3相比,Cirrus HD-OCT倾向于使圆盘和边缘区域最小化,特别是当圆盘和边缘区域较大时,尽管差异和杯形杯的测量水平之间没有关系-光盘比率。光学相干断层扫描法高估了海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪确定的杯体积,特别是当杯体积较大时。结论:Bland-Altman分析显示,除了杯碟比外,Cirrus HD-OCT和Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3形态计量学测量之间的一致性差。此外,除了杯碟比,无法直接比较Cirrus HD-OCT和Heidelberg Retina Tomograph 3的视神经乳头测量值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号