首页> 外文期刊>Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis >Comparison of Two Methods for Determination of Soil Fixed Ammonium
【24h】

Comparison of Two Methods for Determination of Soil Fixed Ammonium

机译:两种测定土壤固定态铵的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Twenty-four soils were sampled from northwestern China to study the relations of fixed or nonexchangeable ammonium (NH4) determined by the widely used Silva-Bremner method and the simplest ignition Mogilevkina method with organic matter (OM), total nitrogen (N), and soil particle composition. Results showed that the averaged values of 24 soils determined by the Silva-Bremner method were 10.7% greater than those using the Mogilevkina method, and the standard deviations of the Mogilevkina method were larger than those of the Silva-Bremner method. There was a close correlation in the fixed NH4 between the two methods (R-2=0.7831, n=24). The low values obtained by the Mogilevkina method were not due to the heat treatment because there was almost no difference in results between heating for 44 and 72 h. Soil OM had no correlation with the fixed NH4 amounts determined by the two methods due to self-correlations, but total N had significantly weak correlations. The soils sampled from northwestern China were dominant in the 2:1 type of clay minerals, and significant correlations were found for the fixed NH4 amounts determined by the two methods with clay as well as with clay plus silt contents. Correlations (R-2) of the fixed NH4 by the Silva-Bremner method were 0.4545 and 0.3145 with clay and clay plus silt contents, respectively, for the initial soils and 0.4765 and 0.446, respectively, for soils after ryegrass planting, which were much greater than those of the Mogilevkina method. Based on the definition of fixed NH4 and the problem that occurred during its determination, two criteria were proposed for evaluation of the methods: (1) the relationship between clay content or clay plus silt contents and fixed NH4 and (2) the correlation of OM content with fixed NH4. By these criteria, the Silva-Bremner method was superior to the Mogilevkina method in terms of reliability and accuracy.
机译:从中国西北地区抽取了24种土壤,研究了通过广泛使用的席尔瓦-布雷姆纳方法和最简单的点火Mogilevkina方法与有机物(OM),总氮(N)和土壤颗粒组成。结果表明,用Silva-Bremner方法测定的24种土壤的平均值比使用Mogilevkina方法测定的土壤平均值高10.7%,而Mogilevkina方法的标准偏差大于Silva-Bremner方法。两种方法之间的固定NH4密切相关(R-2 = 0.7831,n = 24)。通过Mogilevkina方法获得的低值不是由于热处理,因为加热44和72 h之间的结果几乎没有差异。由于自相关,土壤有机质与这两种方法确定的固定NH4量没有相关性,但总氮的相关性却很弱。从中国西北地区采样的土壤以2:1类型的粘土矿物占主导地位,并且发现两种方法测定的固定NH4含量与粘土以及粘土和粉砂含量之间存在显着相关性。 Silva-Bremner方法测得的固定NH4与原始土壤的黏度和黏土含量分别为0.4545和0.3145,对于黑麦草种植后的土壤,其相关系数(R-2)分别为0.4765和0.446。比Mogilevkina方法更大。根据固定NH 4的定义和测定过程中出现的问题,提出了两种评价方法的标准:(1)黏土含量或黏土加粉砂含量与固定NH 4的关系;(2)OM的相关性。 NH4含量固定。根据这些标准,就可靠性和准确性而言,席尔瓦-布雷姆纳方法优于莫吉列夫纳方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号