...
首页> 外文期刊>Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology >From self to social cognition: Theory of Mind mechanisms and their relation to Executive Functioning
【24h】

From self to social cognition: Theory of Mind mechanisms and their relation to Executive Functioning

机译:从自我到社会认知:心理机制理论及其与执行功能的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

'Theory of Mind' refers to the ability to attribute mental states to oneself and other people (Premack 82 Woodruff, 1978). This study examined the extent to which 'Self' and 'Other' belief-attribution processes within the Theory of Mind (TOM) mechanism could be distinguished behaviourally, and whether these separable components differentially related to Executive Functioning (EF) abilities. A computerized false-belief task, utilizing a matched-design to allow direct comparison of self-oriented vs. other-oriented belief-attribution, was used to assess ToM, and a face-image Stroop task was employed to assess EF, within a population of typically-developed adults. Results revealed significantly longer reaction times when attributing beliefs to other people as opposed to recognizing and attributing beliefs to oneself. Intriguingly, results revealed that 'perspective-shift' requirements (i.e. changing from adoption of the 'self' perspective to the perspective of the 'other', or vice versa) across false-belief trials influenced reaction times. Reaction times were significantly longer when the perspective shift was from self-to-other than from other-to-self. It is suggested that the 'self' forms the stem of understanding the 'other', and is therefore processed regardless of ultimate task demands; in contrast, the 'other' perspective is only processed when explicitly required. We conclude that adopting another person's perspective, even when their belief state is matched to one's own, requires more cognitive effort than recalling and reflecting on self-oriented belief-states. (C) 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
机译:“心理理论”是指将精神状态归于自己和他人的能力(Premack 82 Woodruff,1978)。这项研究探讨了在心理理论(TOM)机制中“自我”和“其他”信念归因过程可以在行为上加以区分的程度,以及这些可分离的组成部分是否与执行功能(EF)能力有差异。使用匹配设计允许直接比较自我导向和其他导向的信念归因的计算机化虚假任务用于评估ToM,并使用面部图像Stroop任务来评估EF。通常发达的成年人口。结果表明,将信念归因于他人时,与识别和归因于自己相反,反应时间明显更长。有趣的是,结果表明,在错误信念试验中,“透视转变”要求(即从采用“自我”观点转变为“其他”观点,反之亦然)会影响反应时间。当视角从自我转移到他人时,反应时间明显更长。建议“自我”构成理解“另一个”的基础,因此无论最终任务要求如何,都将对其进行处理;相反,仅在明确需要时才处理“其他”透视图。我们得出的结论是,即使他人的信念状态与自己的信念相匹配,采用他人的观点也需要比回忆和反思自我导向的信念状态付出更多的认知努力。 (C)2015作者。由Elsevier B.V.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号