首页> 外文期刊>Cognition: International Journal of Cognitive Psychology >Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation
【24h】

Dissociating controlled from automatic processing in temporal preparation

机译:在临时准备中从自动处理中分离控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of the present study was to investigate the controlled versus the automatic nature of temporal preparation. If temporal preparation involves controlled rather than automatic processing, it should be reduced by the addition of a concurrent demanding task. This hypothesis was tested by comparing participants' performance in a temporal preparation task that measured two main effects of temporal preparation (temporal orienting and sequential effects) between a single-task and a dual-task condition. In the single-task condition, participants responded to a visual target presented after symbolic cues that were highly predictive of the moment of target onset. In the dual-task condition, the temporal preparation task was performed concurrently with a working memory task. The results showed that sequential effects survived to dual-task interference, while temporal orienting was reduced as a function of the competition for executive resources required by both working memory and temporal preparation tasks. These findings provide direct behavioural evidence that temporal orienting and sequential effects involve dissociable cognitive processes.
机译:本研究的目的是研究临时准备的控制性与自动性。如果临时准备涉及受控而不是自动处理,则应通过增加并发的艰巨任务来减少临时准备。通过比较参与者在时间准备任务中的表现来检验该假设,该时间准备任务测量了单任务和双任务条件之间时间准备的两个主要影响(时间定向和顺序影响)。在单任务情况下,参与者对象征性提示后呈现的视觉目标做出了反应,这些提示可以高度预测目标发作的时间。在双重任务条件下,临时准备任务与工作记忆任务同时执行。结果表明,顺序效应在双任务干扰下得以幸存,而时间定向却因工作记忆和时间准备任务所需的执行资源竞争而减少。这些发现提供了直接的行为证据,表明时间取向和顺序效应涉及可分离的认知过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号